Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30522315›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2018

Examining replicability of an otoacoustic measure of cochlear function during selective attention.

Jordan A Beim, Andrew J Oxenham, Magdalena Wojtczak

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jordan A BeimDepartment of Psychology, N218 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Parkway, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Andrew J OxenhamDepartment of Psychology, N218 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Parkway, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.
Magdalena WojtczakDepartment of Psychology, N218 Elliott Hall, 75 East River Parkway, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

Funding

Supplement for temporal bone histological tissue scanning equipmentR01DC012262 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OXENHAM, ANDREW J. · 2013 to 2023
$4.7M
Dynamic Effects in Peripheral Auditory ProcessingR01DC010374 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WOJTCZAK, MAGDALENA · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
Perceptual and functional role of medial olivocochlear efferents in humansR01DC015462 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WOJTCZAK, MAGDALENA · 2017 to 2021
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010374NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012262NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attention to a target stimulus within a complex scene often results in enhanced cortical representations of the target relative to the background. It remains unclear where along the auditory pathways attentional effects can first be measured. Anatomy suggests that attentional modulation could occur through corticofugal connections extending as far as the cochlea itself. Earlier attempts to investigate the effects of attention on human cochlear processing have revealed small and inconsistent effects. In this study, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions were recorded from a total of 30 human participants as they performed tasks that required sustained selective attention to auditory or visual stimuli. In the first sample of 15 participants, emission magnitudes were significantly weaker when participants attended to the visual stimuli than when they attended to the auditory stimuli, by an average of 5.4 dB. However, no such effect was found in the second sample of 15 participants. When the data were pooled across samples, the average attentional effect was significant, but small (2.48 dB), with 12 of 30 listeners showing a significant effect, based on bootstrap analysis of the individual data. The results highlight the need for considering sources of individual differences and using large sample sizes in future investigations.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAttentionAuditory PathwaysAuditory PerceptionCochleaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousPhotic StimulationReflexReproducibility of ResultsSpeech PerceptionVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID30522315
PMCPMC6246073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.