ArticleThe American journal of medicine2019
Periprocedural Antithrombotic Management from a Patient Perspective: A Qualitative Analysis.
Article in The American journal of medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Potential for a Virtual Care Model in the Perioperative Management of Anticoagulant Therapy: A 5-Year Retrospective Clinic Review.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2023Article
- Improving preprocedure antithrombotic management: Implementation and sustainment of a best practice alert and pharmacist referral process.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021Article
- Assessment of a Best Practice Alert and Referral Process for Preprocedure Antithrombotic Medication Management for Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedures.JAMA network open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeriprocedural antithrombotic medication management is a complex, often confusing process for patients and their providers. Communication difficulties often lead to suboptimal medication management, resulting in delayed or canceled procedures.
methodsWe conducted telephone surveys with patients taking chronic antithrombotic medications who had recently undergone an endoscopy procedure. In the survey, we sought to better understand the periprocedural process for patients taking antithrombotic medications. We conducted a content analysis of patients' unstructured responses from the periprocedural patient phone calls. We used a multistep group coding process to analyze responses. Relationships between different themes and categories were analyzed using original quotes and retrieving thematic segments from the transcripts.
resultsThe survey was administered to 81 patients; 74/81 respondents (91%) said they understood the plan to manage their antithrombotics, but 21/81 respondents (26%) were not completely satisfied with the coordination, communication, and management of their medications. Five primary themes emerged from the content analysis as patient-centered design features affecting periprocedural care: (1) patients require accurate and timely information; (2) a patient's prior experience with antithrombotic therapy affects their understanding of the process; (3) patients prefer receiving their information from a single source, and (4) also prefer different methods of instruction; (5) finally, patients expect their clinician(s) to be available through the periprocedural management process.
conclusionTo optimize the periprocedural medication management communication process, patients desire timeliness, accuracy, and adaptiveness to prior patient experience while offering a single, consistently available point of contact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.