Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30521795›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of medicine2019

Periprocedural Antithrombotic Management from a Patient Perspective: A Qualitative Analysis.

Jennifer Acosta, Christopher Graves, Elizabeth Spranger, Jacob Kurlander, Anne E Sales, Geoffrey D Barnes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer AcostaCenter for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine.
Christopher GravesFrankel Cardiovascular Center.
Elizabeth SprangerPerformance Improvement, Department of Internal Medicine.
Jacob KurlanderDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Health Care System, Mich.
Anne E SalesCenter for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System; Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor.
Geoffrey D BarnesCenter for Bioethics and Social Science in Medicine; Frankel Cardiovascular Center. Electronic address: gbarnes@umich.edu.

Funding

Developing an Implementation Strategy to Improve Peri-procedural Anticoagulation Management for Patients with Atrial FibrillationK01HL135392 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARNES, GEOFFREY DOUGLAS · 2017 to 2021
$842k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL135392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriprocedural antithrombotic medication management is a complex, often confusing process for patients and their providers. Communication difficulties often lead to suboptimal medication management, resulting in delayed or canceled procedures.

methodsWe conducted telephone surveys with patients taking chronic antithrombotic medications who had recently undergone an endoscopy procedure. In the survey, we sought to better understand the periprocedural process for patients taking antithrombotic medications. We conducted a content analysis of patients' unstructured responses from the periprocedural patient phone calls. We used a multistep group coding process to analyze responses. Relationships between different themes and categories were analyzed using original quotes and retrieving thematic segments from the transcripts.

resultsThe survey was administered to 81 patients; 74/81 respondents (91%) said they understood the plan to manage their antithrombotics, but 21/81 respondents (26%) were not completely satisfied with the coordination, communication, and management of their medications. Five primary themes emerged from the content analysis as patient-centered design features affecting periprocedural care: (1) patients require accurate and timely information; (2) a patient's prior experience with antithrombotic therapy affects their understanding of the process; (3) patients prefer receiving their information from a single source, and (4) also prefer different methods of instruction; (5) finally, patients expect their clinician(s) to be available through the periprocedural management process.

conclusionTo optimize the periprocedural medication management communication process, patients desire timeliness, accuracy, and adaptiveness to prior patient experience while offering a single, consistently available point of contact.

Indexed as

Fibrinolytic AgentsHumansPatient-Centered CarePerioperative CareQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesFibrinolytic AgentsAnticoagulationAntithromboticsPatient–provider communicationPerioperative

Identifiers

PMID30521795
PMCPMC6445720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.