ArticlePloS one2018
The relationship between perceptions and self-paid hepatitis B vaccination: A structural equation modeling approach.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Backfire effect of salient information on vaccine take-up experimental evidence from scared-straight intervention in rural northern Nigeria.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Trial
- Article
- Perceptions and Cues to Action as Predictors of Nurses' Vaccination Intentions at Two Primary Health Care Facilities in Ghana.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023Article
- Article
- Hesitancy about COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study based on the health belief model.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Article
- Predicting COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Hong Kong: Vaccine knowledge, risks from coronavirus, and risks and benefits of vaccination.Vaccine: X · 2022Article
- COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance among Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries: A Rapid Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vaccines · 2022Review
- Will People Accept a Third Booster Dose of the COVID-19 Vaccine? A Cross-Sectional Study in China.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- A study of COVID-19 vaccination in the US and Asia: The role of media, personal experiences, and risk perceptions.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Factors influencing acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine in Malaysia: a web-based survey.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2021Article
- Acceptability of COVID-19 vaccine in the working-age population in Shanghai city: a cross-sectional study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Parents' willingness to pay for a COVID-19 vaccine for themselves and their children in the United States.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Article
- Willingness of the general population to accept and pay for COVID-19 vaccination during the early stages of COVID-19 pandemic: a nationally representative survey in mainland China.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Acceptance of the COVID-19 vaccine based on the health belief model: A population-based survey in Hong Kong.Vaccine · 2021Article
- Psychological factors affecting COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Indonesia.The Egyptian journal of neurology, psychiatry and neurosurgery · 2021Article
- The demand for a COVID-19 vaccine in Ecuador.Vaccine · 2020Article
- Willingness-to-pay for a COVID-19 vaccine and its associated determinants in Indonesia.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2020Article
- Acceptance of a COVID-19 Vaccine in Southeast Asia: A Cross-Sectional Study in Indonesia.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
- Study on Status and Willingness towards Hepatitis B Vaccination among Migrant Workers in Chongqing, China: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalaysia has a comprehensive, publicly-funded immunization program for hepatitis B (HepB) among infants, but adults must pay for the vaccine. The number of HepB carriers among adults is expected to increase in the future; therefore, we examined the impact of five constructs (cues to action, perceived barriers, perceived benefit, perceived severity, and perceived susceptibility) on adults' willingness to pay (WTP) for HepB vaccine; secondarily, we examined the association between perceived barriers and perceived benefits.
methodsAdults were selected through a stratified, two-stage cluster community sample in Selangor, Malaysia. The reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity of the measurement model were assessed before implementing a partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM) to evaluate the significance of the structural paths.
resultsA total of 728 participants were enrolled. The five constructs all showed adequate internal reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity. There was a significant, positive relationship to WTP from constructs (perceived barriers [Path coefficient (β) = 0.082, P = 0.036], perceived susceptibility [β = 0.214, P<0.001], and cues to action [β = 0.166, P<0.001]), and the model all together accounted for 8.8% of the variation in WTP. There was a significant, negative relationship between perceived barriers and perceived benefit [β = -0.261, P<0.001], which accounted for 6.8% of variation in perceived benefit.
conclusionsPolicy and programs should be targeted that can modify individuals' thoughts about disease risk, their obstacles in obtaining the preventive action, and their readiness to obtain a vaccine. Such programs include educational materials about disease risk and clinic visits that can pair HepB screening and vaccination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.