Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30521565›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

An efficient proteome-wide strategy for discovery and characterization of cellular nucleotide-protein interactions.

Yan Ting Lim, Nayana Prabhu, Lingyun Dai, Ka Diam Go, Dan Chen, Lekshmy Sreekumar, Louise Egeblad, Staffan Eriksson, Liyan Chen, Saranya Veerappan and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Metabolites as signalling molecules.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Chemoproteomics for Plasmodium Parasite Drug Target Discovery.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yan Ting LimSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Nayana PrabhuSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Lingyun DaiSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Ka Diam GoSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-1782-2775
Dan ChenSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Lekshmy SreekumarSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Louise EgebladDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology and Biochemistry, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Staffan ErikssonDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Liyan ChenSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Saranya VeerappanSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Hsiang Ling TeoNTU Institute of Structural Biology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Chris Soon Heng TanInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Johan LengqvistDepartment of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Andreas LarssonSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Radoslaw M SobotaInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Pär NordlundSchool of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-7794-702X
Nanyang Technological University · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGKarolinska Institutet · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolite-protein interactions define the output of metabolic pathways and regulate many cellular processes. Although diseases are often characterized by distortions in metabolic processes, efficient means to discover and study such interactions directly in cells have been lacking. A stringent implementation of proteome-wide Cellular Thermal Shift Assay (CETSA) was developed and applied to key cellular nucleotides, where previously experimentally confirmed protein-nucleotide interactions were well recaptured. Many predicted, but never experimentally confirmed, as well as novel protein-nucleotide interactions were discovered. Interactions included a range of different protein families where nucleotides serve as substrates, products, co-factors or regulators. In cells exposed to thymidine, a limiting precursor for DNA synthesis, both dose- and time-dependence of the intracellular binding events for sequentially generated thymidine metabolites were revealed. Interactions included known cancer targets in deoxyribonucleotide metabolism as well as novel interacting proteins. This stringent CETSA based strategy will be applicable for a wide range of metabolites and will therefore greatly facilitate the discovery and studies of interactions and specificities of the many metabolites in human cells that remain uncharacterized.

Indexed as

DNA-Binding ProteinsNucleotidesProtein BindingProteinsProteomeRNA-Binding ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsNucleotidesProteinsProteomeRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30521565
PMCPMC6283526
OpenAlexW2904247827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.