Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30521549›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Plasma donor-derived cell-free DNA kinetics after kidney transplantation using a single tube multiplex PCR assay.

Els M Gielis, Charlie Beirnaert, Amélie Dendooven, Pieter Meysman, Kris Laukens, Joachim De Schrijver, Steven Van Laecke, Wim Van Biesen, Marie-Paule Emonds, Benedicte Y De Winter and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Interpreting Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA: From Performance to Decision.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Els M GielisLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-6137-4773
Charlie BeirnaertBiomedical Informatics Research Network Antwerp (Biomina), University of Antwerp/Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Amélie DendoovenDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Pieter MeysmanBiomedical Informatics Research Network Antwerp (Biomina), University of Antwerp/Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-5903-633X
Kris LaukensBiomedical Informatics Research Network Antwerp (Biomina), University of Antwerp/Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Joachim De SchrijverMultiplicom N.V., part of Agilent Technologies, Niel, Belgium.
Steven Van LaeckeRenal Division, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Wim Van BiesenRenal Division, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Marie-Paule EmondsHistocompatibility and Immunogenetic Laboratory, Belgian Red Cross Flanders, Mechelen, Belgium.
Benedicte Y De WinterLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jean-Louis BosmansLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jurgen Del FaveroMultiplicom N.V., part of Agilent Technologies, Niel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7427-7489
Daniel AbramowiczLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Kristien J LedeganckLaboratory of Experimental Medicine and Pediatrics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4377-7648

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter transplantation, cell-free DNA derived from the donor organ (ddcfDNA) can be detected in the recipient's circulation. We aimed to quantify ddcfDNA levels in plasma of kidney transplant recipients thereby investigating the kinetics of this biomarker after transplantation and determining biological variables that influence ddcfDNA kinetics in stable and non-stable patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom 107 kidney transplant recipients, plasma samples were collected longitudinally after transplantation (day 1-3 months) within a multicenter set-up. Cell-free DNA from the donor was quantified in plasma as a fraction of the total cell-free DNA by next generation sequencing using a targeted, multiplex PCR-based method for the analysis of single nucleotide polymorphisms. A subgroup of stable renal transplant recipients was identified to determine a ddcfDNA threshold value.

resultsIn stable transplant recipients, plasma ddcfDNA% decreased to a mean (SD) ddcfDNA% of 0.46% (± 0.21%) which was reached 9.85 (± 5.6) days after transplantation. A ddcfDNA threshold value of 0.88% (mean + 2SD) was determined in kidney transplant recipients. Recipients that did not reach this threshold ddcfDNA value within 10 days after transplantation showed a higher ddcfDNA% on the first day after transplantation and demonstrated a higher individual baseline ddcfDNA%.

conclusionIn conclusion, plasma ddcfDNA fractions decreased exponentially within 10 days after transplantation to a ddcfDNA threshold value of 0.88% or less. To investigate the role of ddcfDNA for rejection monitoring of the graft, future research is needed to determine causes of ddcfDNA% increases above this threshold value.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsCell-Free Nucleic AcidsHumansKidney TransplantationKineticsLongitudinal StudiesMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProspective StudiesTransplant RecipientsCell-Free Nucleic Acids

Identifiers

PMID30521549
PMCPMC6283554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.