Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30521536›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Comparison of efficacy of SHENQI compound and rosiglitazone in the treatment of diabetic vasculopathy analyzing multi-factor mediated disease-causing modules.

Hong Gao, Yuhong Duan, Xiaoxu Fu, Hongyan Xie, Ya Liu, Haipo Yuan, Mingyang Zhou, Chunguang Xie

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hong GaoTeaching Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3050-6462
Yuhong DuanDepartment Two of Endocrinology, Teaching Hospital, Shaanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3796-4116
Xiaoxu FuTeaching Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1089-8013
Hongyan XieTeaching Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0153-9986
Ya LiuTeaching Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1949-8430
Haipo YuanTeaching Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7183-3139
Mingyang ZhouTeaching Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8002-1677
Chunguang XieTeaching Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1038-9545
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNAffiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Atherosclerosis-predominant vasculopathy is a common complication of diabetes with high morbidity and high mortality, which is ruining the patient's daily life. As is known to all, traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) SHENQI compound and western medicine rosiglitazone play an important role in the treatment of diabetes. In particular, SHENQI compound has a significant inhibitory effect on vascular lesions. Here, to explore and compare the therapeutic mechanism of SHENQI compound and rosiglitazone on diabetic vasculopathy, we first built 7 groups of mouse models. The behavioral, physiological and pathological morphological characteristics of these mice showed that SHENQI compound has a more comprehensive curative effect than rosiglitazone and has a stronger inhibitory effect on vascular lesions. While rosiglitazone has a more effective but no significant effect on hypoglycemic. Further, based on the gene expression of mice in each group, we performed differential expression analysis. The functional enrichment analysis of these differentially expressed genes (DEGs) revealed the potential pathogenesis and treatment mechanisms of diabetic angiopathy. In addition, we found that SHENQI compound mainly exerts comprehensive effects by regulating MCM8, IRF7, CDK7, NEDD4L by pivot regulator analysis, while rosiglitazone can rapidly lower blood glucose levels by targeting PSMD3, UBA52. Except that, we also identified some pivot TFs and ncRNAs for these potential disease-causing DEG modules, which may the mediators bridging drugs and modules. Finally, similar to pivot regulator analysis, we also identified the regulation of some drugs (e.g. bumetanide, disopyramide and glyburide etc.) which have been shown to have a certain effect on diabetes or diabetic angiopathy, proofing the scientific and objectivity of this study. Overall, this study not only provides an in-depth comparison of the efficacy of SHENQI compound and rosiglitazone in the treatment of diabetic vasculopathy, but also provides clinicians and drug designers with valuable theoretical guidance.

Indexed as

AnimalsAorta, AbdominalCardiovascular AgentsDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Diabetic AngiopathiesDisease Models, AnimalDrugs, Chinese HerbalGene ExpressionHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMedicine, Chinese TraditionalMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Mutant StrainsCardiovascular AgentsDrugs, Chinese HerbalHypoglycemic AgentsRosiglitazoneshenqi

Identifiers

PMID30521536
PMCPMC6283585
OpenAlexW2904514450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.