Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30521025›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2019

Gestational Age at Arrest of Development: An Alternative Approach for Assigning Time at Risk in Studies of Time-Varying Exposures and Miscarriage.

Alexandra C Sundermann, Sudeshna Mukherjee, Pingsheng Wu, Digna R Velez Edwards, Katherine E Hartmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexandra C SundermannVanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Sudeshna MukherjeeVanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Pingsheng WuDepartment of Biostatistics, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Digna R Velez EdwardsVanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Katherine E HartmannVanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Institute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3M
Consequences and Course of Uterine Fibroids in PregnancyR01HD043883 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E · 2004 to 2008
$3.1M
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory use and miscarriageR01HD049675 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI HARTMANN, KATHERINE E · 2006 to 2010
$2.6M
Examining Complex Relationships Between Alcohol Exposure and Miscarriage RiskF30HD094345 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SUNDERMANN, ALEXANDRA CLARE · 2018 to 2020
$94k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NICHD NIH HHS F30 HD094345NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD043883NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD049675NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The time between arrest of pregnancy development and miscarriage represents a window in which the pregnancy is nonviable and not developing. In effect, the pregnancy loss has already occurred, and additional exposure cannot influence its outcome. However, epidemiologic studies of miscarriage traditionally use gestational age at miscarriage (GAM) to assign time in survival analyses, which overestimates duration of exposure and time at risk. In Right From the Start, a pregnancy cohort study (2000-2012), we characterized the gap between estimated gestational age at arrest of development (GAAD) and miscarriage using transvaginal ultrasound in 500 women recruited from 3 states (North Carolina, Tennessee, and Texas). We compared effect estimates from models using GAAD with GAM to assign time at risk through a simulation study of several exposure patterns with varying effect sizes. The median gap between GAAD and miscarriage was 23 days (interquartile range, 15-32). Use of GAAD decreased the bias and variance of the estimated association for time-varying exposures, whereas half the time using GAM led to estimates that differed from the true effect by more than 20%. Using GAAD to assign time at risk should result in more accurate and consistent characterization of miscarriage risk associated with time-varying exposures.

Indexed as

Gestational AgeTime FactorsAbortion, SpontaneousAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansNorth CarolinaPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsTennesseeTexasUltrasonography, PrenatalYoung Adultbias (epidemiology)measurement errormiscarriagepregnancyreproductive epidemiologysimulation studyspontaneous abortion

Identifiers

PMID30521025
PMCPMC6395168
OpenAlexW2904265316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.