Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30520961›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

Protein-protein interaction sites prediction by ensemble random forests with synthetic minority oversampling technique.

Xiaoying Wang, Bin Yu, Anjun Ma, Cheng Chen, Bingqiang Liu, Qin Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoying WangCollege of Mathematics and Physics, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China.
Bin YuCollege of Mathematics and Physics, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China.
Anjun MaBioinformatics and Mathematical Biosciences Lab, Department of Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.
Cheng ChenCollege of Mathematics and Physics, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao, China.
Bingqiang LiuSchool of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Qin MaBioinformatics and Mathematical Biosciences Lab, Department of Agronomy, Horticulture and Plant Science, South Dakota State University, Brookings, SD, USA.

Funding

Construction of cell specific gene co-regulations signatures based on single cell transcriptomics analysisR01GM131399 · NIGMS · SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MA, QIN · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM131399
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationThe prediction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) sites is a key to mutation design, catalytic reaction and the reconstruction of PPI networks. It is a challenging task considering the significant abundant sequences and the imbalance issue in samples.

resultsA new ensemble learning-based method, Ensemble Learning of synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) for Unbalancing samples and RF algorithm (EL-SMURF), was proposed for PPI sites prediction in this study. The sequence profile feature and the residue evolution rates were combined for feature extraction of neighboring residues using a sliding window, and the SMOTE was applied to oversample interface residues in the feature space for the imbalance problem. The Multi-dimensional Scaling feature selection method was implemented to reduce feature redundancy and subset selection. Finally, the Random Forest classifiers were applied to build the ensemble learning model, and the optimal feature vectors were inserted into EL-SMURF to predict PPI sites. The performance validation of EL-SMURF on two independent validation datasets showed 77.1% and 77.7% accuracy, which were 6.2-15.7% and 6.1-18.9% higher than the other existing tools, respectively. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source codes and data used in this study are publicly available at http://github.com/QUST-AIBBDRC/EL-SMURF/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSoftware

Identifiers

PMID30520961
PMCPMC6612859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.