Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30520953›Full record

ArticleJAMA facial plastic surgery2019

Assessment of Hedgehog Signaling Pathway Activation for Craniofacial Bone Regeneration in a Critical-Sized Rat Mandibular Defect.

Matthew Q Miller, Logan F McColl, Michael R Arul, Jonathan Nip, Vedavathi Madhu, Gina Beck, Kishan Mathur, Vashaana Sahadeo, Jason R Kerrigan, Stephen S Park and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA facial plastic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Alveolar Bone Regeneration: Smart Biomaterials and Physical Stimulation.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. An overview of de novo bone generation in animal models.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew Q MillerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Logan F McCollDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Michael R ArulDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington.
Jonathan NipDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington.
Vedavathi MadhuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Gina BeckDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Kishan MathurCenter for Applied Biomechanics, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Vashaana SahadeoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Jason R KerriganDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Stephen S ParkDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
J Jared ChristophelDepartment of Otolaryngology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Abhijit S DigheDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
Sangamesh G KumbarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington.
Quanjun CuiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
University of Virginia · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

Biodegradable Matrices for Bone HealingR01EB020640 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI KUMBAR, SANGAMESH GURAPPA, YU, XIAOJUN · 2017 to 2020
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceOsseous craniofacial defects are currently reconstructed with bone grafting, rigid fixation, free tissue transfer, and/or recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2. Although these treatment options often have good outcomes, they are associated with substantial morbidity, and many patients are not candidates for free tissue transfer.

objectiveTo assess whether polysaccharide-based scaffold (PS) constructs that are cross-linked with smoothened agonist (SAG), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and bone morphogenetic protein 6 (BMP-6) would substantially increase bone regeneration. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsThis animal model study was conducted at the University of Virginia School of Medicine Cui Laboratory from March 1, 2017, to June 30, 2017. Thirty-three 10-week-old female Lewis rats were acquired for the study. Bilateral nonsegmental critical-sized defects were created in the angle of rat mandibles. The defects were either left untreated or filled with 1 of the 9 PSs. The rats were killed after 8 weeks, and bone regeneration was evaluated using microcomputed tomographic imaging and mechanical testing. Analysis of variance testing was used to compare the treatment groups. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Blinded analysis and computer analysis of the microcomputed tomographic images were used to assess bone regeneration.

resultsIn the 33 female Lewis rats, minimal healing was observed in the untreated mandibles. Addition of SAG was associated with increases in bone regeneration and bone density in all treatment groups, and maximum bone healing was seen in the group with BMP-6, VEGF, and SAG cross-linked to PS. For each of the 5 no scaffold group vs BMP-6, VEGF, and SAG cross-linked to PS group comparisons, mean defect bone regeneration was 4.14% (95% CI, 0.94%-7.33%) vs 66.19% (95% CI, 54.47%-77.90%); mean bone volume, 14.52 mm3 (95% CI, 13.07-15.97 mm3) vs 20.87 mm3 (95% CI, 14.73- 27.01 mm3); mean bone surface, 68.97 mm2 (95% CI, 60.08-77.85 mm2) vs 96.77 mm2 (95% CI, 76.11-117.43 mm2); mean ratio of bone volume to total volume, 0.11 (95% CI, 0.10-0.11) vs 0.15 (95% CI, 0.10-0.19); and mean connectivity density 0.03 (95% CI, 0.02-0.05) vs 0.32 (95% CI, 0.25-0.38). On mechanical testing, mandibles with untreated defects broke with less force than control mandibles in which no defect was made, although this force did not reach statistical significance. No significant difference in force to fracture was observed among the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this rat model study, activation of the hedgehog signaling pathway using smoothened agonist was associated with increased craniofacial bone regeneration compared with growth factors alone, including US Food and Drug Administration-approved recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2. Pharmaceuticals that target this pathway may offer a new reconstructive option for bony craniofacial defects as well as nonunion and delayed healing fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone DensityBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6Bone RegenerationBone SubstitutesBone TransplantationFemaleHedgehog ProteinsMandibleModels, AnimalRatsRats, Inbred LewSignal TransductionTissue ScaffoldsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor ABone Morphogenetic Protein 2Bone Morphogenetic Protein 6Bone SubstitutesHedgehog ProteinsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

Identifiers

PMID30520953
PMCPMC6439804
OpenAlexW2903781254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.