Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30520890›Full record

ReviewThe Analyst2019

Direct sampling mass spectrometry for clinical analysis.

Fan Pu, Spencer Chiang, Wenpeng Zhang, Zheng Ouyang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Analyst, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fan PuState Key Laboratory of Precision Measurement Technology and Instruments, Department of Precision Instrument, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
Spencer Chiang
Wenpeng Zhang
Zheng Ouyang

Funding

Novel approaches for quantitative assessment of adherenceR01AI122298 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ANDERSON, PETER L. · 2016 to 2020
$3.4M
Quantification of Circulating Antigens for Pediatric TB Diagnosis andTreatment MonitoringR01AI122932 · NIAID · METHODIST HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HU, TONY Y. · 2016 to 2019
$1.8M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI122298NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI122932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct sampling mass spectrometry (MS) has been advancing aggressively, showing immense potential in translating MS into the clinical field. Unlike traditional MS analysis involving extensive sample preparation and chromatographic separation, quick and simple procedures with minimal sample pretreatment or purification became available with direct sampling. An overview of the development in this field is provided, including some representative ambient ionization and fast extraction methods. Quantitative applications of these methods are emphasized and their efficacy are highlighted from a clinical aspect; non-quantitative applications in clinical analysis are also discussed. This review also discusses the integration of direct sampling MS with miniature mass spectrometers and its future outlook as an emerging clinical tool for point-of-care analysis.

Indexed as

HumansMass SpectrometryPoint-of-Care SystemsSpecimen Handling

Identifiers

PMID30520890
PMCPMC6370527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.