ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2019
Non-genetic and genetic predictors of a superficial first basal cell carcinoma.
Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome and Sporadic Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study of Clinicopathological Features.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2025Article
- Assessment of sun-related behavior and serum vitamin D in basal cell carcinoma: Preliminary results.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020Article
- Comparison of Socio-demographic Characteristics, Tumour Features, and Surgical Treatment Outcomes in Phenotypic Variants of Basal Cell Carcinoma.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSeveral observational studies have suggested differences in the risk factor profile between patients with superficial basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) and non-superficial BCCs.
objectiveTo test the reproducibility of previous study findings and to find new genetic and non-genetic predictors for patients with a superficial first BCC.
methodsA total of 14.628 participants of northwestern European descent aged 45 years or older from a prospective population-based cohort study (Rotterdam Study) were linked with the Dutch Pathology Registry (PALGA) of whom 1528 were identified as BCC patients. After exclusion, 948 eligible BCC patients remained for further non-genetic analyses and 1014 for genetic analyses. We included 11 phenotypic, environmental and tumour-specific characteristics, and 20 candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) as potential predictors for patients with a superficial first BCC. We performed binary logistic multivariable regression analyses.
resultsWe found that patients with a superficial first BCC were significantly younger, almost two times more often female and 12-18 times more likely to have their BCC on the trunk or extremities than patients with a non-superficial first BCC. One SNP (rs12203592), mapped to IRF4, looked promising (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.13-2.97, P-value <0.05), but after adjustment for multiple testing, no significant differences in genetic make-up between superficial BCC and non-superficial BCC patients were found.
conclusionWe conclude that patients with a superficial BCC differ from non-superficial BCC patients with respect to environmental factors (tumour localization as a proxy for UVR exposure) and phenotypic characteristics (age and sex), but we found no difference in genotype. As superficial BCC patients develop their first BCCs at a younger age, they could be at higher lifetime risk for subsequent skin cancers and therefore be an important group for secondary prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.