Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30520175›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

The voice of patients in system redesign: A case study of redesigning a centralized system for intake of referrals from primary care to rheumatologists for patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis.

Elena Lopatina, Jean L Miller, Sylvia R Teare, Nancy J Marlett, Jatin Patel, Claire E H Barber, Dianne P Mosher, Tracy Wasylak, Linda J Woodhouse, Deborah A Marshall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Primary Care: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient experiences of the urgent cancer referral pathway-Can the NHS do better? Semi-structured interviews with patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Elena LopatinaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8233-587X
Jean L MillerO'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sylvia R TeareO'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nancy J MarlettCommunity Rehabilitation and Disability Studies, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Jatin PatelStrategic Clinical Networks™, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Claire E H BarberDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Dianne P MosherDepartment of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Tracy WasylakStrategic Clinical Networks™, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Linda J WoodhouseDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1615-8895
Deborah A MarshallDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8467-8008

Funding

Alberta Health ServicesAlberta InnovatesCanadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR)Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Health System (PRIHS)The Arthritis Society
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe published literature demands examples of health-care systems designed with the active engagement of patients to explore the application of this complex phenomenon in practice.

methodsThis case study explored how the voice of patients was incorporated into the process of redesigning an element of the health-care system, a centralized system for intake of referrals from primary care to rheumatologists for patients with suspected rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-centralized intake. The phenomenon of patient engagement using "patient and community engagement researchers" (PaCERs) in research and the process of redesigning centralized intake were selected as the case. In-depth evaluation of the case was undertaken through the triangulation of findings from the document review and participants' reflection on the case.

resultsIn this case, patients and PaCERs participated in multiple activities including an initial meeting of key stakeholders to develop the project vision; a patient-to-patient PaCERs study to gather perspectives of patients with RA on the challenges they face in accessing and navigating the health-care system, and what they see as key elements of an effective system that would be responsive to their needs; the development of an evaluation framework for future centralized intake; and the choice of candidate centralized intake strategies to be evaluated.

conclusionsThe described feasible multistep approach to active patient engagement in health-care system redesign contributes to an understanding of the application of this complex phenomenon in practice. Therefore, the manuscript serves as one more step towards a patient-centred health-care system that is redesigned with active patient engagement.

Indexed as

Patient ParticipationAdultArthritis, RheumatoidBritish ColumbiaFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services ResearchHumansMaleMiddle AgedOrganizational Case StudiesPrimary Health CareQuality Assurance, Health CareReferral and ConsultationRheumatologyStakeholder Participationhealth system redesignpatient-centred carepatient engagement in research and system redesignpatient needspatient-to-patient research

Identifiers

PMID30520175
PMCPMC6543166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.