ArticleThe Prostate2019
Ex vivo treatment of prostate tumor tissue recapitulates in vivo therapy response.
Article in The Prostate, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision-cut tumor slices: a biomimetic tool for accelerating oncological development from basic research to clinical translation.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
- In Vitro and Ex Vivo Models to Study Molecular Trafficking Across the Human Intestinal Barrier.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Prediction of Patient Drug Response via 3D Bioprinted Gastric Cancer Model Utilized Patient-Derived Tissue Laden Tissue-Specific Bioink.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
- New uses for an old technique: live imaging on the slice organ culture to study reproductive processes†.Biology of reproduction · 2024Article
- Defining the challenges and opportunities for using patient-derived models in prostate cancer research.The Prostate · 2024Review
- Preclinical models of prostate cancer - modelling androgen dependency and castration resistance in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- The future of patient-derived xenografts in prostate cancer research.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- Culture of vibrating microtome tissue slices as a 3D model in biomedical research.Journal of biological engineering · 2023Review
- Experimental in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo models in prostate cancer research.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- Ex Vivo Functional Assay for Evaluating Treatment Response in Tumor Tissue of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Cancers · 2023Article
- A clinical evaluation of anFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Precision-Cut Tumor Slices (PCTS) as an Ex Vivo Model in Immunotherapy Research.Antibodies (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- A Microfluidic Cancer-on-Chip Platform Predicts Drug Response Using Organotypic Tumor Slice Culture.Cancer research · 2022Article
- Recent advances in organotypic tissue slice cultures for anticancer drug development.International journal of biological sciences · 2022Review
- Harnessing the Utility ofFrontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Identification of soluble tissue-derived biomarkers from human thyroid tissue explants maintained on a microfluidic device.Oncology letters · 2021Article
- Coherent confocal light scattering spectroscopic microscopy evaluates cancer progression and aggressiveness in live cells and tissue.ACS photonics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn vitro models of prostate cancer (PCa) are not always reliable to evaluate anticancer treatment efficacy. This limitation may be overcome by using viable tumor slice material. Here we report on the establishment of an optimized ex vivo method to culture tissue slices from patient-derived xenografts (PDX) of prostate cancer (PCa), to assess responses to PCa treatments.
methodsThree PDX models were used that are characterized by different androgen receptor (AR) expression and different homology directed DNA repair capacities, due to a breast cancer associated two (BRCA2) wild-type or mutated status. Tumors were removed from mice, sliced using a vibratome and cultured for a maximum of 6 days. To test the sensitivity to androgen antagonist, tumor slices from the AR-expressing and AR-negative PDX tumors were treated with the anti-androgen enzalutamide. For sensitivity to DNA repair intervention, tumors slices from BRCA2 wild-type and mutated PDXs were treated with the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 inhibitor olaparib. Treatment response in these tumor slices was determined by measuring slice morphology, cell proliferation, apoptosis, AR expression level, and secretion of prostate specific antigen (PSA).
resultsWe compared various culture conditions (support materials, growth media, and use of a 3D smooth rocking platform) to define the optimal condition to maintain tissue viability and proliferative capacity up to least 6 days. Under optimized conditions, enzalutamide treatment significantly decreased proliferation, increased apoptosis, and reduced AR-expression and PSA secretion of AR-expressing tumor slices compared to AR-negative slices, that did not respond to the intervention. Olaparib treatment significantly increased cell death in BRCA2 mutated tumors slices as compared to slices from BRCA2 wild type tumors.
conclusionsEx vivo treatment of PCa PDX tumor slices with enzalutamide and olaparib recapitulates responses previously observed in vivo. The faithful retention of tissue structure and function in this ex vivo model offers an ideal opportunity for treatment efficacy screening, thereby reducing costs and numbers of experimental animals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.