Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30519908›Full record

SynthesisEndocrine2019

Italian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology: the risk of malignancy between indeterminate lesions at low or high risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pierpaolo Trimboli, Anna Crescenzi, Marco Castellana, Francesco Giorgino, Luca Giovanella, Massimo Bongiovanni

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic ReviewConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Natural History of Cytologically Low-Risk Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Performance ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Pierpaolo TrimboliDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Thyroid Centre, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland. pierpaolo.trimboli@eoc.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2125-4937
Anna CrescenziSection of Pathology, University Hospital Campus Bio Medico, Rome, Italy.
Marco CastellanaDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Andrology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Francesco GiorginoDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Section of Internal Medicine, Endocrinology, Andrology and Metabolic Diseases, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Luca GiovanellaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Thyroid Centre, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Massimo BongiovanniService of Clinical Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Institute of Oncology Research · CHUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundItalian consensus for the classification and reporting of thyroid cytology has proposed to discriminate the cancer prevalence of high (Tir 3B) vs. low (Tir 3A) risk indeterminate nodules. To obtain more robust evidence on this topic, we performed a meta-analysis of the Odds Ratio (OR) of malignancy of Tir 3B vs. Tir 3A nodules.

methodsA comprehensive literature exploration of online databases was conducted until May 2018. Original articles reporting histology of nodules cytologically classified as Tir 3A and Tir 3B were eligible. Pooled cancer prevalence in Tir 3A and Tir 3B, and OR of Tir 3B vs. Tir 3A were calculated.

resultsThe search revealed 95 articles, and 10 were included for the meta-analysis. Overall, 1168 indeterminate lesions were reported (441 Tir 3A and 727 Tir 3B), of which 391 were cancers. The pooled cancer prevalence was 17% in Tir 3A and 47% in Tir 3B. The OR of Tir 3B vs. Tir 3A was 4.24 (95% CI 2.75 to 6.53) with mild heterogeneity and without publication bias. When we considered non-invasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) as non-malignant, cancer rate was lower, and OR of Tir 3B against Tir 3A was 2.93 (95% CI 1.60 to 5.37), with no heterogeneity but with publication bias.

conclusionsThe Italian system for thyroid cytology is reliable to assess indeterminate lesions at low and high risk, being Tir 3B associated with a cancer risk significantly higher than Tir 3A, also when considering NIFTP as non-malignant entity.

Indexed as

HumansThyroid GlandThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleCarcinomaFine-needle aspiration (FNA)Indeterminate nodulesRisk of malignancyThyroid

Identifiers

PMID30519908
OpenAlexW2902673199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.