Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30519898›Full record

Trial reportJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2019

Transdermal versus oral estrogen: clinical outcomes in patients undergoing frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer cycles without GnRHa suppression, a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Semra Kahraman, Caroline Pirkevi Çetinkaya, Yucel Sahin, Gokalp Oner

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Semra KahramanAssisted Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Genetics Centre, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Piyale Pasa Bulvari, 34385, Okmeydani, Istanbul, Turkey. semkahraman@gmail.com.
Caroline Pirkevi ÇetinkayaAssisted Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Genetics Centre, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Piyale Pasa Bulvari, 34385, Okmeydani, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yucel SahinAssisted Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Genetics Centre, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Piyale Pasa Bulvari, 34385, Okmeydani, Istanbul, Turkey.
Gokalp OnerAssisted Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Genetics Centre, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Piyale Pasa Bulvari, 34385, Okmeydani, Istanbul, Turkey.
Istanbul Memorial Hospital · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo conduct a non-inferiority study to compare the clinical outcomes of transdermal estrogen patch and oral estrogen in patients undergoing frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer non-donor cycles without GnRHagonist (GnRHa) suppression.

methodsA total of 317 women with irregular menses or anovulatory cycle undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) non-donor cycles without GnRHa suppression were involved in a prospective randomized clinical trial between May 2017 and October 2017. The trial was conducted in an ART and Reproductive Genetics Centre within a private hospital. The unit is designated as a teaching center by the Turkish Ministry of Health. Oral or transdermal estrogen was administered in patients undergoing frozen-thawed single blastocyst transfer. The outcomes of the study were the following: endometrial thickness on the day of progesterone administration, implantation rate, and clinical and viable ongoing pregnancy rates.

resultsEndometrial thickness and clinical outcomes of oral and transdermal estrogen administration were equally successful (p > 0.05).

conclusionNo significant difference was found in endometrial thickness on the day of progesterone administration nor in clinical outcomes between transdermal estrogen and oral estrogen in patients undergoing frozen-thawed single blastocyst stage transfer cycles without GnRHa suppression.

Indexed as

Administration, CutaneousAdministration, OralAdultCryopreservationEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferEndometriumEstradiolEstrogensFemaleGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateProgesteroneEstradiolEstrogensGonadotropin-Releasing HormoneProgesteroneCycle outcomesEndometrial thicknessOral estrogenTransdermal estrogen

Identifiers

PMID30519898
PMCPMC6439127
OpenAlexW2902843417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.