Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30519731›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2019

The QIAGEN 140-locus single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panel for forensic identification using massively parallel sequencing (MPS): an evaluation and a direct-to-PCR trial.

I Avent, A G Kinnane, N Jones, I Petermann, R Daniel, M E Gahan, D McNevin

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Complex kinship testing using the MGIEasy Pa-SNPs genotyping kit.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

I AventNational Centre for Forensic Studies, Faculty of Science & Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia. Isabelle.Avent@canberra.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-2706
A G KinnaneNational Centre for Forensic Studies, Faculty of Science & Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
N JonesQIAGEN Pty Ltd, Chadstone Centre, Chadstone, VIC, Australia.
I PetermannQIAGEN Pty Ltd, Chadstone Centre, Chadstone, VIC, Australia.
R DanielOffice of the Chief Forensic Scientist, Victoria Police Forensic Services Department, Macleod, VIC, Australia.
M E GahanNational Centre for Forensic Studies, Faculty of Science & Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
D McNevinNational Centre for Forensic Studies, Faculty of Science & Technology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
University of Canberra · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AUVictoria Police · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) of identity informative single-nucleotide polymorphisms (IISNPs) enables hundreds of forensically relevant markers to be analysed simultaneously. Generating DNA sequence data enables more detailed analysis including identification of sequence variations between individuals. The GeneRead DNAseq 140 IISNP MPS panel (QIAGEN) has been evaluated on both the MiSeq (Illumina) and Ion PGM™ (Applied Biosystems) MPS platforms using the GeneRead DNAseq Targeted Panels V2 library preparation workflow (QIAGEN). The aims of this study were to (1) determine if the GeneRead DNAseq panel is effective for identity testing by assessing deviation from Hardy-Weinberg (HWE) and pairwise linkage equilibrium (LE); (2) sequence samples with the GeneRead DNAseq panel on the Ion PGM™ using the QIAGEN workflow and assess specificity, sensitivity and accuracy; (3) assess the efficacy of adding biological samples directly to the GeneRead DNAseq PCR, without prior DNA extraction; and (4) assess the effect of varying coverage and allele frequency thresholds on genotype concordance. Analyses of the 140 SNPs for HWE and LE using Fisher's exact tests and the sequential Bonferroni correction revealed that one SNP was out of HWE in the Japanese population and five SNP combinations were commonly out of LE in 13 of 14 populations. The panel was sensitive down to 0.3125 ng of DNA input. A direct-to-PCR approach (without DNA extraction) produced highly concordant genotypes. The setting of appropriate allele frequency thresholds is more effective for reducing erroneous genotypes than coverage thresholds.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideSequence Analysis, DNAAnimalsEthnicityGene FrequencyGenotypeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLinkage DisequilibriumPolymerase Chain ReactionRacial GroupsSensitivity and SpecificitySpecies SpecificityDirect-to-PCRDNAseq panelForensicIdentityMPSSNP

Identifiers

PMID30519731
OpenAlexW2903380189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.