Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30519650›Full record

ArticleReproductive biomedicine & society online2018

Initiating patient discussions about oocyte cryopreservation: Attitudes of obstetrics and gynaecology resident physicians.

B Peterson, C Gordon, J K Boehm, M C Inhorn, P Patrizio

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive biomedicine & society online, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

B PetersonChapman University, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Marriage and Family Therapy Program, One University Drive, Orange, CA 92688, USA.
C GordonUniversity of California Irvine Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program, Orange, CA, USA.
J K BoehmChapman University, Crean College of Health and Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychology, Orange, CA, USA.
M C InhornYale University, Department of Anthropology, New Haven, CT, USA.
P PatrizioYale University, Fertility Center, New Haven, CT, USA.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 209829/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the attitudes of obstetrics and gynaecology (OB/GYN) resident physicians to initiating patient discussions regarding medical and elective oocyte cryopreservation (OC). The study used a cross-sectional online survey of OB/GYN medical residents in the USA, sampled from residency programmes approved by the American Council for Graduate Medical Education. In total, 208 medical residents, distributed evenly between postgraduate years 1-4, participated in the study. Residents' fertility knowledge and attitudes to initiating discussions about OC were gathered. Forty percent (

Indexed as

fertility preservationgynaecologymedical educationobstetricsoocyte cryopreservationpreconception counselling

Identifiers

PMID30519650
PMCPMC6259041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.