Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30519580›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2018

Anti-IL-5 and IL-5Ra: Efficacy and Safety of New Therapeutic Strategies in Severe Uncontrolled Asthma.

Diego Bagnasco, Marco Caminati, Matteo Ferrando, Teresita Aloè, Elisa Testino, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Giovanni Passalacqua

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Eosinophilic esophagitis: Immune mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Clinical and experimental allergy : journal of the British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2022
    Review
  6. Taking a Breather: Advances in Interleukin 5 Inhibition for Asthma Relief.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Biologics in severe asthma: the role of real-world evidence from registries.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Holy Grail: the journey towards disease modification in asthma.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Biologics to Treat Severe Asthma in Children and Adolescents: A Practical Update.Pediatric allergy, immunology, and pulmonology · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Diego BagnascoAllergy & Respiratory Diseases, DIMI Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Marco CaminatiAsthma Center and Allergy Unit, Verona University and General Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Matteo FerrandoAllergy & Respiratory Diseases, DIMI Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Teresita AloèAllergy & Respiratory Diseases, DIMI Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Elisa TestinoAllergy & Respiratory Diseases, DIMI Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Giorgio Walter CanonicaAllergy & Respiratory Diseases, DIMI Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.
Giovanni PassalacquaAllergy & Respiratory Diseases, DIMI Department of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5139-3604
Ospedale Policlinico San Martino · ITHumanitas University · ITUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The current developments of the new biological drugs targeting interleukin 5 (IL-5) and IL-5 receptor allowed to expand the treatment options for severe hypereosinophilic asthma. Clinicians will then be able to choose between antibodies targeting either circulating IL-5 or its receptor expressed on eosinophils and basophils. The available clinical trials consistently reported favorable results about the reduction of exacerbations rate, improvement in quality of life, and sparing of the systemic steroid use, with a favorable safety profile. Two of these new drugs are administered subcutaneously, mepolizumab every 4 weeks and benralizumab every 8 weeks, whereas reslizumab is given intravenously monthly on a weigh-based dose. In the future, the research actions will be involved in the identification of a single biomarker or multiple biomarkers for the optimal choice of biological agents to be properly prescribed.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Asthmatic AgentsAsthmaHumansInterleukin-5Interleukin-5 Receptor alpha SubunitQuality of LifeAnti-Asthmatic AgentsInterleukin-5Interleukin-5 Receptor alpha Subunit

Identifiers

PMID30519580
PMCPMC6241368
OpenAlexW2900071066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.