Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30519579›Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2018

Is Vibration Training Good for Your Bones? An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Jorge Marin-Puyalto, Alba Gomez-Cabello, Alejandro Gonzalez-Agüero, Alejandro Gomez-Bruton, Angel Matute-Llorente, Jose A Casajús, German Vicente-Rodríguez

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jorge Marin-PuyaltoFaculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing. Universidad de Zaragoza, Ronda Misericordia 5, 22001 Huesca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1042-542X
Alba Gomez-CabelloGENUD (Growth, Exercise, Nutrition and Development) Research Group, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6492-2512
Alejandro Gonzalez-AgüeroFaculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing. Universidad de Zaragoza, Ronda Misericordia 5, 22001 Huesca, Spain.
Alejandro Gomez-BrutonFaculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing. Universidad de Zaragoza, Ronda Misericordia 5, 22001 Huesca, Spain.
Angel Matute-LlorenteFaculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing. Universidad de Zaragoza, Ronda Misericordia 5, 22001 Huesca, Spain.
Jose A CasajúsFaculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing. Universidad de Zaragoza, Ronda Misericordia 5, 22001 Huesca, Spain.
German Vicente-RodríguezFaculty of Health and Sport Science (FCSD), Department of Physiatry and Nursing. Universidad de Zaragoza, Ronda Misericordia 5, 22001 Huesca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4303-4097

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-body vibration (WBV) intervention studies and reviews have been increasing lately. However, the results regarding its effects on bone tissue in different populations are still inconclusive. The goal of this overview was to summarize systematic reviews assessing the effects of WBV training on bone parameters. Three electronic databases were scanned for systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the effects of WBV on bone tissue. The search had no time restrictions and was limited to articles written in English. Vibration protocols and the main bone parameters included in each review were extracted. Methodological quality was assessed and analyses were conducted stratifying by age. 17 reviews and meta-analyses fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No increase or small improvements in bone mineral density (BMD) after WBV interventions were observed in reviews regarding postmenopausal women. One intervention study regarding young adults was included and reported no bone-related benefits from WBV. Most reviews including children and adolescents with compromised bone mass showed an improvement of BMD at lower limbs, lumbar spine, and whole body. In conclusion, WBV interventions seem to help children and adolescents with compromised bone mass to increase their BMD, but these improvements are limited in postmenopausal women and there is insufficient evidence for young adults. Further research is also needed to identify the ideal parameters of WBV training focused on bone health.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesBone and BonesBone DensityFemaleHumansLower ExtremityLumbar VertebraeMaleOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalVibration

Identifiers

PMID30519579
PMCPMC6241242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.