Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30519569›Full record

Observational studyBioMed research international2018

Should We Always Use Antibiotics after Urodynamic Studies in High-Risk Patients?

Pawel Miotla, Sara Wawrysiuk, Kurt Naber, Ewa Markut-Miotla, Pawel Skorupski, Katarzyna Skorupska, Tomasz Rechberger

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pawel Miotla2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1902-6484
Sara Wawrysiuk2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Kurt NaberDepartment of Urology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ewa Markut-MiotlaDepartment of Paediatric Pulmonology and Rheumatology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-3657-1134
Pawel Skorupski2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Katarzyna Skorupska2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Tomasz Rechberger2nd Department of Gynaecology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PLTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of this observational study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a phytotherapic drug (Canephron N) in preventing urinary tract infection (UTI) in high-risk women undergoing urodynamic studies (UDS).

methodsThe study protocol was approved by the local institutional ethical committee. Adult women with at least one risk factor for acquiring UTI (defined as: age over 70, elevated postvoid residual urine>100 ml, recurrent UTI, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) ≥II in POP-Q scale, and neurogenic bladder) had received after UDS either a single oral dose of fosfomycin trometamol (FT) (3 grams) or a phytodrug containing centaury herb, lovage root, and rosemary leaves (5 ml taken orally three times daily for one week). All patients included in the study had no pyuria according to urine dipstick (nitrite and/or blood and/or leukocyte esterase) and negative urine culture (CFU < 10

resultsSeventy-two high-risk participants completed the study. Seven days after urodynamic studies UTI symptoms, pyuria (nitrite and/or blood and/or leukocyte esterase) and bacteriuria with

conclusionProphylaxis of UTI with a phytodrug (Canephron N) may be considered a good alternative to antibiotic prophylaxis use after UDS in high-risk female patients.

Indexed as

AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisBacteriuriaEscherichia coliFemaleFosfomycinHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedPlant ExtractsPyuriaRisk FactorsUrodynamicsAnti-Bacterial Agentscanephron NFosfomycinPlant Extracts

Identifiers

PMID30519569
PMCPMC6241335
OpenAlexW2899880343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.