Ecology and life history of

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Collecting eco-evolutionary data in the dark: Impediments to subterranean research and how to overcome them.Ecology and evolution · 2021
   Review
2. Optimizing speleological monitoring efforts: insights from long-term data for tropical iron caves.PeerJ · 2021
   Article
3. Between darkness and light: spring habitats provide new perspectives for modern researchers on groundwater biology.PeerJ · 2021
   Article
4. Cave morphology, microclimate and abundance of five cave predators from the Monte Albo (Sardinia, Italy).Biodiversity data journal · 2020
   Article
5. Continental data on cave-dwelling spider communities across Europe (Arachnida: Araneae).Biodiversity data journal · 2019
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as