Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30519498›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2018

Evaluation of RETICs Glaucoma Diagnostic Calculators in Preperimetric Glaucoma.

Javier Moreno-Montañés, Ana García-Nieva, Indira Aristeguieta Osio, Adriano Guarnieri, Antonio Morilla-Grasa, Marta García-Granero, Alfonso Antón

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A Pattern-Based OCT Metric for Glaucoma Detection.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Javier Moreno-MontañésDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Medical School, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Ana García-NievaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Medical School, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Indira Aristeguieta OsioInstitut Catalá de Retina, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Adriano GuarnieriDepartment of Ophthalmology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Medical School, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Antonio Morilla-GrasaInstitut Catalá de Retina, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Marta García-GraneroUnidad de Estadística, Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Alfonso AntónInstitut Catalá de Retina, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate two glaucoma diagnostic calculators (GDC) in a group of eyes with preperimetric glaucoma (PPG).

methodsAll eyes (

resultsDefinitions one, two, and three were met by 44 (16.6%), 29 (10.9%), and 11 (4.2%) eyes, respectively. The GDC indices (means ± standard deviations) were, respectively, 14.49 ± 21.55% and 26.06 ± 22.50% using the combined and quantitative GDC (

conclusionsThe values of both GDC were higher in the PPG group than the ocular hypertension group. The GDC were higher when more columns in the GPA software indicated progression. Both GDC showed a similar ability to detect PPG. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: These calculators facilitate diagnosis of PPG in ocular hypertensive eyes.

Indexed as

glaucoma diagnosisglaucoma diagnostic calculatorOCToptic diskpreperimetric glaucomaretinal ganglion cellretinal nerve fiber layer

Identifiers

PMID30519498
PMCPMC6269137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.