Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30519419›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2018

The disproportionate importance of long-unburned forests and woodlands for reptiles.

Kelly M Dixon, Geoffrey J Cary, Graeme L Worboys, Philip Gibbons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Trends and Gaps in Prescribed Burning Research.Environmental management · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Forest restoration in a time of fire: perspectives from tall, wet eucalypt forests subject to stand-replacing wildfires.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelly M DixonFenner School of Environment and Society The Australian National University Acton ACT Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2226-9356
Geoffrey J CaryFenner School of Environment and Society The Australian National University Acton ACT Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6386-1751
Graeme L WorboysFenner School of Environment and Society The Australian National University Acton ACT Australia.
Philip GibbonsFenner School of Environment and Society The Australian National University Acton ACT Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6454-1306

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of the impacts of time since fire on reptiles remains limited, partly because there are relatively few locations where long-term, spatially explicit fire histories are available. Such information is important given the large proportion of some landscapes that are managed with frequent prescribed fire to meet fuel management objectives. We conducted a space-for-time study across a landscape in southeastern Australia where the known fire history spanned 6 months to at least 96 years. Four methods were used to survey reptiles in 81 forest and woodland sites to investigate how time since fire (TSF), habitat, and environmental variables affect reptile richness, abundance, and composition. We used generalized linear models, generalized linear mixed-effects models, PERMANOVA, and SIMPER to identify relationships between the reptile assemblage (richness, abundance, and composition, respectively) and TSF, habitat, and environmental variables. All three reptile metrics were associated with TSF. Reptile richness and abundance were significantly higher in sites >96 years postfire than younger fire ages (0.5-12 years). Reptile composition at long-unburned sites was dissimilar to sites burned more recently but was similar between sites burned 0.5-2 and 6-12 years prior to sampling.

Indexed as

biodiversityfire managementfire mosaicprescribed burningtime since fire

Identifiers

PMID30519419
PMCPMC6262929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.