ArticleBiotechnology for biofuels2018
Simultaneous consumption of cellobiose and xylose by
Article in Biotechnology for biofuels, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Expanded genome and proteome reallocation in a novel, robustmSystems · 2024Article
- Comparative genome analysis of microbial strains marketed for probiotic interventions: an extension of the Integrated Probiotic Database.Microbiome research reports · 2024Article
- Bioprospecting Microalgae from Sewage Water: Assessment of Biochemicals for Biomass Utilization.Molecular biotechnology · 2023Article
- Understanding the Effect of Different Glucose Concentrations in the Oligotrophic BacteriumMicroorganisms · 2023Article
- Time-resolved transcriptomic and proteomic profiling ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Efficient lactic acid production from dilute acid-pretreated lignocellulosic biomass by a synthetic consortium of engineered Pseudomonas putida and Bacillus coagulans.Biotechnology for biofuels · 2021Article
- Article
- Transcriptional Changes in the Xylose Operon inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe use of inedible lignocellulosic biomasses for biomanufacturing provides important environmental and economic benefits for society. Efficient co-utilization of lignocellulosic biomass-derived sugars, primarily glucose and xylose, is critical for the viability of lignocellulosic biorefineries. However, the phenomenon of glucose repression prevents co-utilization of both glucose and xylose in cellulosic hydrolysates.
resultsTo circumvent glucose repression, co-utilization of cellobiose and xylose by
conclusionsThis study demonstrated the cellobiose-assimilating pathway of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.