ReviewFrontiers in psychology2018
Can We Infer Inter-Individual Differences in Risk-Taking From Behavioral Tasks?
Review in Frontiers in psychology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Promoting Psychological Well-being in Preschoolers Through Mindfulness-based Socio-emotional Learning: A Randomized-controlled Trial.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2024Trial
- Does the reliability of computational models truly improve with hierarchical modeling? Some recommendations and considerations for the assessment of model parameter reliability : Reliability of computational model parameters.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Review
- Test-retest reliability of reinforcement learning parameters.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Reliable, rapid, and remote measurement of metacognitive bias.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Impulsivity is a stable, measurable, and predictive psychological trait.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Performing well but not appreciating it - A trait feature of anorexia nervosa.JCPP advances · 2024Article
- ReX: an integrative tool for quantifying and optimizing measurement reliability for the study of individual differences.Nature methods · 2023Article
- Reliability of Decision-Making and Reinforcement Learning Computational Parameters.Computational psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2023Article
- Variability in repeated economic games: comparing trust game decisions to other social trust measures.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- Relating psychiatric symptoms and self-regulation during the COVID-19 crisis.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Contagion of Temporal Discounting Value Preferences in Neurotypical and Autistic Adults.Journal of autism and developmental disorders · 2022Article
- Simple questionnaires outperform behavioral tasks to measure socio-emotional skills in students.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Probabilistic Decision-Making in Children With Dyslexia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Ergodicity-breaking reveals time optimal decision making in humans.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Childhood environmental adversity is not linked to lower levels of cooperative behaviour in economic games.Evolutionary human sciences · 2021Article
- Compulsivity and impulsivity traits linked to attenuated developmental frontostriatal myelination trajectories.Nature neuroscience · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Investigating the bases of inter-individual differences in risk-taking is necessary to refine our cognitive and neural models of decision-making and to ultimately counter risky behaviors in real-life policy settings. However, recent evidence suggests that behavioral tasks fare poorly compared to standard questionnaires to measure individual differences in risk-taking. Crucially, using model-based measures of risk taking does not seem to improve reliability. Here, we put forward two possible - not mutually exclusive - explanations for these results and suggest future avenues of research to improve the assessment of inter-individual differences in risk-taking by combining repeated online testing and mechanistic computational models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.