Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30519164›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2018

Sugar Metabolism Regulates Flavor Preferences and Portal Glucose Sensing.

Lingli Zhang, Wenfei Han, Chenguanlu Lin, Fei Li, Ivan E de Araujo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Expectation Modulates Hedonic Experiences and Midbrain Responses to Sweet Flavor.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  5. A lateralized pathway for associating nutrients with flavors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The interoceptive origin of reinforcement learning.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Protein Extract of a Probiotic Strain ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Glucose Sensing in the Hepatic Portal Vein and Its Role in Food Intake and Reward.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. The neural basis of sugar preference.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lingli ZhangShanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenfei HanThe John B. Pierce Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Chenguanlu LinThe John B. Pierce Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Fei LiMinistry of Education-Shanghai Key Laboratory of Children's Environmental Health, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ivan E de AraujoThe John B. Pierce Laboratory, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJohn B. Pierce Laboratory · USShanghai Children's Medical Center · CNXinHua Hospital · CN

Funding

Neural circuitry of sweet tasteR01DC014859 · NIDCD · JOHN B. PIERCE LABORATORY, INC. · PI DE ARAUJO, IVAN E · 2015 to 2019
$1.5M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC014859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In most species, including humans, food preference is primarily controlled by nutrient value. In particular, glucose-containing sugars exert exquisitely strong effects on food choice via gut-generated signals. However, the identity of the visceral signals underlying glucose's rewarding effects remains uncertain. In particular, it is unknown whether sugar metabolism mediates the formation of preferences for glucose-containing sugars. Using the mouse as a model organism, we made use of a combination of conditioning schedules, gastrointestinal nutrient administration, and chromatographic/electrochemical methods to assess the behavioral and neural effects of activating the gut with either metabolizable glucose or a non-metabolizable glucose analog. We show that mice display much superior preferences for flavors associated with intra-gastric infusions of glucose compared to flavors associated with intra-gastric infusions of the non-metabolizable glucose analog α-methyl-D-glucopyranoside ("MDG," an activator of intestinal sodium/glucose co-transporters). These effects were unaffected by surgical bypassing of the duodenum, suggesting glucose-specific post-absorptive sensing mechanisms. Consistently, intra-portal infusions of glucose, but not of MDG, induced significant rises in dopamine (DA) levels within brain reward circuits. Our data reveal that the unmatched rewarding effects of glucose-containing sugars cannot be accounted for by metabolism-independent activation of sodium/glucose cotransporters; rather, they point to glucose metabolism as the physiological mechanism underlying the potent reward value of sugar-sweetened flavored beverages. In particular, no circulating "gut factors" need to be invoked to explain the reward value of ingested glucose. Thus, instead of circulating gut hormones, portal-mesenteric sensing of glucose emerges as the preferential physiological pathway for sugar reward.

Indexed as

dopamineflavor preferencesglucose metabolismportal veinstriatumsugar

Identifiers

PMID30519164
PMCPMC6258782
OpenAlexW2901161340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.