Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30518829›Full record

ReviewActa pharmacologica Sinica2019

Human pharmacology of positive GABA-A subtype-selective receptor modulators for the treatment of anxiety.

Xia Chen, Joop van Gerven, Adam Cohen, Gabriel Jacobs

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. GABADrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gingerols and Shogaols ofJournal of experimental pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Distinct ACC Neural Mechanisms Underlie Authentic and Transmitted Anxiety Induced by Maternal Separation in Mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Abnormal Expression of Synaptic and Extrasynaptic GABAInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Voltage-clamp evidence of GABAPharmacological reports : PR · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xia ChenChina National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100070, China. connie_6096@126.com.
Joop van GervenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, 2333 CL, The Netherlands. jm.v.gerven@ccmo.nl.
Adam CohenCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, 2333 CL, The Netherlands.
Gabriel JacobsCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, 2333 CL, The Netherlands. GJacobs@chdr.nl.
Centre for Human Drug Research · NLCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety disorders arise from disruptions among the highly interconnected circuits that normally serve to process the streams of potentially threatening stimuli. The resulting imbalance among these circuits can cause a fundamental misinterpretation of neural sensory information as threatening and can lead to the inappropriate emotional and behavioral responses observed in anxiety disorders. There is considerable preclinical evidence that the GABAergic system, in general, and its α2- and/or α5-subunit-containing GABA(A) receptor subtypes, in particular, are involved in the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders. However, the clinical efficacy of GABA-A α2-selective agonists for the treatment of anxiety disorders has not been unequivocally demonstrated. In this review, we present several human pharmacological studies that have been performed with the aim of identifying the pharmacologically active doses/exposure levels of several GABA-A subtype-selective novel compounds with potential anxiolytic effects. The pharmacological selectivity of novel α2-subtype-selective GABA(A) receptor partial agonists has been demonstrated by their distinct effect profiles on the neurophysiological and neuropsychological measurements that reflect the functions of multiple CNS domains compared with those of benzodiazepines, which are nonselective, full GABA(A) agonists. Normalizing the undesired pharmacodynamic side effects against the desired on-target effects on the saccadic peak velocity is a useful approach for presenting the pharmacological features of GABA(A)-ergic modulators. Moreover, combining the anxiogenic symptom provocation paradigm with validated neurophysiological and neuropsychological biomarkers may provide further construct validity for the clinical effects of novel anxiolytic agents. In addition, the observed drug effects on serum prolactin levels support the use of serum prolactin levels as a complementary neuroendocrine biomarker to further validate the pharmacodynamic measurements used during the clinical pharmacological study of novel anxiolytic agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Anxiety AgentsAnxiety DisordersBenzodiazepinesBrainGABA-A Receptor AgonistsHumansReceptors, GABA-AAnti-Anxiety AgentsBenzodiazepinesGABA-A Receptor AgonistsGABRA2 protein, humanReceptors, GABA-Aanxiety disordersclinical pharmacologyGABA-A receptors

Identifiers

PMID30518829
PMCPMC6786312
OpenAlexW2902180436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.