Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30518727›Full record

ArticleJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2019

Coefficients in the CAVI Equation and the Comparison Between CAVI With and Without the Coefficients Using Clinical Data.

Koji Takahashi, Tomoyuki Yamamoto, Shinichi Tsuda, Fumio Okabe, Tadashi Shimose, Yoshinori Tsuji, Kenji Suzuki, Kuniaki Otsuka, Masanobu Takata, Kazuhiro Shimizu and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Noninvasive hemodynamic indices of vascular aging: an in silico assessment.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Koji TakahashiFukuda Denshi Co., Ltd.
Tomoyuki YamamotoFukuda Denshi Co., Ltd.
Shinichi TsudaFukuda Denshi Co., Ltd.
Fumio OkabeOsaka Hospital Anti-Tuberculosis Association.
Tadashi ShimoseOsaka Hospital Anti-Tuberculosis Association.
Yoshinori TsujiOsaka Hospital Anti-Tuberculosis Association.
Kenji SuzukiJapan Health Promotion Foundation.
Kuniaki OtsukaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University.
Masanobu TakataToyama Teishin Hospital.
Kazuhiro ShimizuDepartment of Internal Medicine, Toho University Sakura Medical Center.
Junji UchinoMihama Hospital.
Kohji ShiraiMihama Hospital.
Fukuda Denshi (Japan) · JPOsaka Hospital · JPTomitahama Hospital · JPAichi Health Promotion Foundation · JPToho University · JPTokyo Teishin Hospital · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) is a stiffness index of the arterial tree from the origin of the aorta to the ankle, independent of blood pressure at the time of measurement. The CAVI equation includes the coefficients "a" and "b" to adjust it to the value of Hasegawa's pulse wave velocity, which is compensated for at 80 mmHg of diastolic pressure. To verify this adjustment with the coefficients, the clinical significance of CAVI and CAVI without the coefficients (haβ) were compared in both an epidemiological study and an acute clinical study.

methodsIn the epidemiological study, the significances of CAVI and haβ among people with or without coronary risks such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, hyperglycemia, and abnormal electrocardiography change, were compared. In the acute clinical study, nitroglycerin was administered to subjects in a control group and to coronary artery disease patients, observing CAVI and haβ values over a 20-min period.

resultsThere was no discrepancy in terms of statistically significant differences between CAVI and haβ among subjects with or without risk factors. Furthermore, there was also no discrepancy in terms of statistically significant differences between CAVI and haβ during the changes of those values following nitroglycerin administration over a 20-min period.

conclusionIn both the epidemiologic and clinical studies, there was no discrepancy in terms of significant differences between CAVI and haβ. These results suggest that both are valid as indices of stiffness of the arterial tree from the origin of the aorta to the ankle.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseC-Reactive ProteinFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHomocysteineHumansLipoprotein(a)MaleMiddle AgedPeripheral Arterial DiseaseBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinHomocysteineLipoprotein(a)CAVIHasegawa’s pulse wave velocityhaβStiffness Parameter β

Identifiers

PMID30518727
PMCPMC6514175
OpenAlexW2902484138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.