Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30518637›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2018

Autophagy in crop plants: what's new beyond

Jie Tang, Diane C Bassham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Can autophagy enhance crop resilience to environmental stress?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Protein Dynamics in Plant Immunity: Insights into Plant-Pest Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Autophagy in plants.Autophagy reports · 2024
    Review
  13. Syncytium Induced by Plant-Parasitic Nematodes.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Linking Autophagy to Potential Agronomic Trait Improvement in Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie TangDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3253-4894
Diane C BasshamDepartment of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA bassham@iastate.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7411-9360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is a major degradation and recycling pathway in plants. It functions to maintain cellular homeostasis and is induced by environmental cues and developmental stimuli. Over the past decade, the study of autophagy has expanded from model plants to crop species. Many features of the core machinery and physiological functions of autophagy are conserved among diverse organisms. However, several novel functions and regulators of autophagy have been characterized in individual plant species. In light of its critical role in development and stress responses, a better understanding of autophagy in crop plants may eventually lead to beneficial agricultural applications. Here, we review recent progress on understanding autophagy in crops and discuss potential future research directions.

Indexed as

AutophagyArabidopsisAutophagy-Related ProteinsCrops, AgriculturalGene Expression Regulation, PlantPlant ProteinsStress, PhysiologicalAutophagy-Related ProteinsPlant Proteinsautophagycropsdevelopmentplant–microbe interactionsstress responses

Identifiers

PMID30518637
PMCPMC6303781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.