Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30518582›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Pregnancy-associated cancers and birth outcomes in children: a Danish and Swedish population-based register study.

Natalie C Momen, Linn Håkonsen Arendt, Andreas Ernst, Jørn Olsen, Jiong Li, Mika Gissler, Cecilia H Ramlau-Hansen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pregnancy-Associated Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Natalie C MomenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Linn Håkonsen ArendtDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas ErnstDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Jørn OlsenDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Jiong LiDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus N, Denmark.
Mika GisslerNational Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Helsinki, Finland.
Cecilia H Ramlau-HansenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Aarhus University · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKFinnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to estimate the association between pregnancy-associated maternal cancers, diagnosed both prenatally and postnatally, and birth outcomes.

designPopulation-based register study.

settingNational registers of Denmark and Sweden.

participantsA total of 5 523 365 children born in Denmark (1977-2008) and Sweden (1973-2006).Primary and secondary outcome measures: gestational age, birth weight, size for gestational age, Apgar score, caesarean section and sex were the outcomes of interest. ORs and relative risk ratios (RRR) with 95% CIs were estimated using logistic regression and multinomial logistic regression, respectively.

resultsIn this study, 2% of children were born to mothers with a diagnosis of cancer. Children whose mothers received a prenatal cancer diagnosis had higher risk of being born preterm (RRR: 1.77, 95% CI 1.64 to 1.90); low birth weight (RRR 1.84, 95% CI 1.69 to 2.01); low Apgar score (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.20 to 1.56); and by caesarean section (OR: 1.69, 95% CI 1.59 to 1.80). Associations moved towards the null for analyses using postnatal diagnoses, but preterm birth (RRR: 1.13, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.17) and low birth weight (RRR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.18) remained statistically significant, while risk of caesarean section became so (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98). Additionally, statistical significance was reached for large for gestational age (RRR: 1.06, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.11), high birth weight (RRR: 1.04, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.06) and caesarean section (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 0.98).

conclusionsResults suggest an association between pregnancy-associated cancers and adverse birth outcomes in the offspring. While this is strongest for prenatally diagnosed cancers, some smaller associations exist for postnatally diagnosed cancers, indicating that cancer itself could affect fetal development, or that cancer and adverse birth outcomes share risk factors. Future studies on maternal cancer during pregnancy should consider including some postnatal years in their exposure window.

Indexed as

AdolescentApgar ScoreBirth WeightCesarean SectionChildChild, PreschoolDenmarkFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornLongitudinal StudiesMalePregnancybirth outcomescancercancer epidemiologypregnancyregister-based epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID30518582
PMCPMC6286483
OpenAlexW2902829944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.