Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30518436›Full record

ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2018

Tumor heterogeneity in gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the small bowel: volumetric CT texture analysis as a potential biomarker for risk stratification.

Cui Feng, Fangfang Lu, Yaqi Shen, Anqin Li, Hao Yu, Hao Tang, Zhen Li, Daoyu Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparing endoscopic ultrasonography and double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the preoperative diagnosis of gastric stromal tumor.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cui FengDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Fangfang LuDepartment of Radiology, Luoyang Central Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Luoyang, 471009, China.
Yaqi ShenDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Anqin LiDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Hao YuDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Hao TangDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Zhen LiDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China. zhenli@hust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8037-4245
Daoyu HuDepartment of Radiology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1095 Jiefang Avenue, Qiaokou District, Wuhan, 430030, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81571642National Natural Science Foundation of China 81701657National Natural Science Foundation of China 81771801
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore whether volumetric CT texture analysis (CTTA) can serve as a potential imaging biomarker for risk stratification of small bowel gastrointestinal stromal tumors (small bowel-GISTs).

methodsA total of 90 patients with small bowel-GISTs were retrospectively reviewed, of these, 26 were rated as high risk, 13 as intermediate risk, and 51 as low or very low risk. Histogram parameters extracted from CT images were compared among small bowel-GISTs with different risk levels by using one-way analysis of variance. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) and areas under the curve (AUCs) were analyzed to determine optimal histogram parameters for stratifying tumor risk.

resultsSignificant differences in mean attenuation, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentile attenuation, and entropy were found among high, intermediate, and low risk small bowel-GISTs (p ≤ 0.001). Mean attenuation, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentile attenuation, and entropy derived from arterial phase and venous phase images correlated significantly with risk levels (r = 0.403-0.594, r = 0.386-0.593, respectively). Entropy in venous phase reached the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.830, p < 0.001) for differentiating low risk from intermediate to high risk small bowel-GISTs, with a cut-off value of 5.98, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 82.4 and 74.4%, respectively.

conclusionsVolumetric CT texture features, especially entropy, may potentially serve as biomarkers for risk stratification of small bowel-GISTs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkersCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRiskBiomarkersComputed tomographyGastrointestinal stromal tumorsPathologyRisk assessmentTexture analysis

Identifiers

PMID30518436
PMCPMC6280355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.