Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30518412›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2018

A randomized, blinded, controlled trial to assess sand fly mortality of fluralaner administered orally in dogs.

Sonia Ares Gomez, Javier Lucientes, Juan Antonio Castillo, Maria Paz Peris, Sarah Delacour, Paula Ortega, Ronald-Vladimir Oropeza, Albert Picado

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Biology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sonia Ares GomezISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. soniaares@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8583-1473
Javier LucientesDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Juan Antonio CastilloDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Maria Paz PerisDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Sarah DelacourDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Paula OrtegaDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Ronald-Vladimir OropezaDepartment of Animal Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Albert PicadoISGlobal, Hospital Clínic - Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. albert.picado@isglobal.org.
Universidad de Zaragoza · ESBarcelona Institute for Global Health · ES

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council () nº 642609"
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeishmania infantum is the parasite responsible for the disease in humans known as zoonotic visceral leishmaniasis (ZVL). Dogs are considered the main domestic reservoir of ZVL and sand flies are the proven vectors. The use of systemic insecticides in dogs has been studied as an alternative strategy to control ZVL in endemic areas. One systemic insecticide in dogs, fluralaner, has a proven anti-sand fly effect in membrane-fed studies. However, the efficacy and duration on sand flies directly feeding from dogs treated with fluralaner remains unknown.

methodsDirect feeding bioassays were performed on 10 beagle dogs that had been randomly assigned to two groups: one with five dogs orally treated with Bravecto® (fluralaner) and other five as a control. About 30 females of Phlebotomus papatasi were allowed to directly feed from dogs at seven days before the administration of the treatment and Days 3, 17, 31, 45 and 73 post-treatment. Sand fly mortality after feeding was observed every 24 h for 5 days. The Kaplan-Meyer method, Henderson-Tilton formula and a negative binomial mixed model were used to respectively calculate: (i) mortality and its 95% confidence interval (CI); (ii) efficacy of the insecticide at killing sand flies in 24 h; and (iii) differences in the risk of sand fly death at 24 h after feeding.

resultsControl sand fly mortality 24 h after feeding was always ≤ 20% and mortality in the fluralaner group ranged from 2% (95% CI: 0-4%) 7 days before treatment to 100% at 3 days post-treatment. Fluralaner efficacy was 100, 93, 94 and 75% at Days 3, 17, 31 and 45, respectively (P < 0.0001). The increase in the risk of sand fly death was 32.9 (95% CI: 4-263), 76 (95% CI: 8-705), 95.8 (95% CI: 9-1029) and 10.6 times (95% CI: 1.43-79) on Days 3, 17, 31 and 45, respectively

conclusionsThe efficacy of fluralaner, orally administered to dogs, against sand-flies was above 90% for 31 days. Fluralaner administered to dogs should be further evaluated as a control strategy in ZVL endemic areas.

Indexed as

AnimalsDog DiseasesDogsFemaleInsecticidesInsect VectorsIsoxazolesLeishmaniasis, VisceralMalePhlebotomusPsychodidaeRandom AllocationTreatment OutcomeA1443 compoundInsecticidesIsoxazolesDogsFluralanerSand fliesSystemic insecticidesZoonotic visceral leishmaniasis (ZVL)

Identifiers

PMID30518412
PMCPMC6282346
OpenAlexW2903302324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.