ArticleGenome biology2018
NmeCas9 is an intrinsically high-fidelity genome-editing platform.
Article in Genome biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
82 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Overview of Programmable Epigenetic Editing Based on CRISPR Tools for Gene Expression Regulation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Review
- Wheat's Up with CRISPR-Cas-Current Advances, Obstacles and Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advanced CRISPR Technologies for RNA Imaging in Live Cells.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Review
- A Computational Model for Nme1Cas9 HNH Activation Driven by Dynamic Interface Engineering at Residues S593 and W596.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- A multifunctional approach: merging CRISPR/Cas technology with DNA nanomachines for advanced biosensing.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Review
- Precision gene editing: The power of CRISPR-Cas in modern genetics.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
- CRISPR-based therapeutic genome editing for inherited blood disorders.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2025Review
- Molecular signaling pathways in osteoarthritis and biomaterials for cartilage regeneration: a review.Bioengineered · 2025Review
- PAM-readID is a rapid, simple, and accurate PAM determination method for CRISPR-Cas enzymes in mammalian cells.Communications biology · 2025Article
- A compact base editor rescues AATD-associated liver and lung disease in mouse models.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025Article
- Functional Characterization of Fp2Cas9, a Cold-Adapted Type II-C CRISPR Nuclease fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Off-target interactions in the CRISPR-Cas9 Machinery: mechanisms and outcomes.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Review
- Improving the Efficiency of CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Non-Homologous End Joining Gene Knockout Using Small Molecules in Porcine Cells.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Barcodes based on nucleic acid sequences: Applications and challenges (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2025Review
- Advances in Therapeutic Applications of CRISPR Genome Editing for Spinal Pain Management.Neurospine · 2025Article
- Mechanism of Cas9 inhibition by AcrIIA11.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
- Efforts to Downsize Base Editors for Clinical Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- CasGen: A Regularized Generative Model for CRISPR Cas Protein Design with Classification and Margin-Based Optimization.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Engineering of CRISPR-Cas PAM recognition using deep learning of vast evolutionary data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- AAV vector-derived elements integrate into Cas9-generated double-strand breaks and disrupt gene transcription.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Article
22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe development of CRISPR genome editing has transformed biomedical research. Most applications reported thus far rely upon the Cas9 protein from Streptococcus pyogenes SF370 (SpyCas9). With many RNA guides, wildtype SpyCas9 can induce significant levels of unintended mutations at near-cognate sites, necessitating substantial efforts toward the development of strategies to minimize off-target activity. Although the genome-editing potential of thousands of other Cas9 orthologs remains largely untapped, it is not known how many will require similarly extensive engineering to achieve single-site accuracy within large genomes. In addition to its off-targeting propensity, SpyCas9 is encoded by a relatively large open reading frame, limiting its utility in applications that require size-restricted delivery strategies such as adeno-associated virus vectors. In contrast, some genome-editing-validated Cas9 orthologs are considerably smaller and therefore better suited for viral delivery.
resultsHere we show that wildtype NmeCas9, when programmed with guide sequences of the natural length of 24 nucleotides, exhibits a nearly complete absence of unintended editing in human cells, even when targeting sites that are prone to off-target activity with wildtype SpyCas9. We also validate at least six variant protospacer adjacent motifs (PAMs), in addition to the preferred consensus PAM (5'-N
conclusionsOur results show that NmeCas9 is a naturally high-fidelity genome-editing enzyme and suggest that additional Cas9 orthologs may prove to exhibit similarly high accuracy, even without extensive engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.