Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30518393›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2018

Socio-economic and age variations in response to supermarket-led checkout food policies: a repeated measures analysis.

Katrine Ejlerskov, Stephen J Sharp, Martine Stead, Ashley J Adamson, Martin White, Jean Adams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katrine EjlerskovMRC Epidemiology Unit & Centre for Diet and Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Stephen J SharpMRC Epidemiology Unit & Centre for Diet and Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Martine SteadInstitute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.
Ashley J AdamsonInstitute of Health & Society and Human Nutrition Research Centre, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Martin WhiteMRC Epidemiology Unit & Centre for Diet and Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jean AdamsMRC Epidemiology Unit & Centre for Diet and Activity Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. jma79@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-7830

Funding

British Heart FoundationCancer Research UKDepartment of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-001Medical Research Council MR/K023187/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDietary inequalities between population groups are common with older and more affluent individuals tending to have healthier diets. Differential responses to health interventions may exacerbate inequalities. Changing what foods are displayed at supermarket checkouts is one intervention that has the potential to change diets. The aim of this study was to assess whether differences in purchases of common checkout foods from supermarkets with different checkout food policies varied according to age group and social grade.

methodsWe analysed annual household purchase data for 2013-17 from nine leading UK supermarkets, split according to age of the main household shopper and household social grade. Checkout food policies were categorised as clear and consistent, vague or inconsistent, and none. Policies were heterogeneous but all included removal of confectionery and/or chocolate from checkouts. Mixed effects linear regression models were used to assess differences in purchases of common checkout foods (sugary confectionery, chocolate and potato crisps) by checkout food policy and whether these varied by age group or occupational social grade.

resultsRelative to supermarkets with no checkout food policy, 14% (95% CI: 4-22%) fewer purchases of common checkout foods per household per percentage market share were made in supermarkets with a clear and consistent policy. Adjusted mean numbers of purchases were higher in older age groups than the youngest, but there were no differences between the highest and other social grades. There were significant interactions between checkout food policy and both age group and social grade. In supermarkets with clear and consistent policies, 23% (6-36%), 20% (2-34%), and 23% (7-37%) fewer purchases were made in age groups 45-54, 55-64 and 65+ years respectively, compared to all groups combined. In supermarkets with clear and consistent policies, there were 21% (4-35%), 26% (9-39%) and 21% (3-35%) fewer purchases made by households in the highest two and lowest social grades respectively, compared to all groups combined.

conclusionsHouseholds with older main shoppers and those in the most and least affluent social grades may be most responsive to supermarket checkout food policies. As older and more affluent groups tend to have healthier diets overall, it is unlikely that supermarket checkout food policies contribute to greater dietary equity.

Indexed as

Age FactorsConsumer BehaviorNutrition PolicySocioeconomic FactorsAdultAgedDietFamily CharacteristicsFood SupplyHumansMiddle AgedResearch DesignDietInequalitiesPolicyPublic healthSupermarket

Identifiers

PMID30518393
PMCPMC6282373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.