Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30518372›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2018

Predictors of positive airway pressure therapy termination in the first year: analysis of big data from a German homecare provider.

Holger Woehrle, Michael Arzt, Andrea Graml, Ingo Fietze, Peter Young, Helmut Teschler, Joachim H Ficker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. SleepOMICS: How Big Data Can Revolutionize Sleep Science.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Holger WoehrleSleep and Ventilation Center Blaubeuren, Respiratory Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany. hwoehrle@lungenzentrum-ulm.de.
Michael ArztDepartment of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Andrea GramlResMed Science Center, ResMed Germany, Martinsried, Germany.
Ingo FietzeCharité - University Medical Center Berlin, Center for Cardiovascular and Vascular Medicine, Interdisciplinary Sleep Medicine Center, Berlin, Germany.
Peter YoungClinic for Sleep Medicine and Neuromuscular Diseases, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany.
Helmut TeschlerDepartment of Pneumology, Ruhrlandklinik, West German Lung Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
Joachim H FickerDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Allergology and Sleep Medicine, General Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany. ficker@klinikum-nuernberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is a lack of robust data about factors predicting continuation (or termination) of positive airway pressure therapy (PAP) for sleep apnea. This analysis of big data from a German homecare provider describes patients treated with PAP, analyzes the therapy termination rate over the first year, and investigates predictive factors for therapy termination.

methodsData from a German homecare service provider were analyzed retrospectively. Patients who had started their first PAP therapy between September 2009 and April 2014 were eligible. Patient demographics, therapy start date, and the date of and reason for therapy termination were obtained. At 1 year, patients were classified as having compliance-related therapy termination or remaining on therapy. These groups were compared, and significant predictors of therapy termination determined.

resultsOf 98,329 patients included in the analysis, 11,702 (12%) terminated PAP therapy within the first year (after mean 171 ± 91 days). There was a U-shaped relationship between therapy termination and age; therapy termination was higher in the youngest (< 30 years, 15.5%) and oldest (≥ 80 years, 19.8%) patients, and lower in those aged 50-59 years (9.9%). Therapy termination was significantly more likely in females versus males (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.42-1.54), in those with public versus private insurance (1.75, 1.64-1.86) and in patients whose first device was automatically adjusting or fixed-level continuous positive airway pressure versus bilevel or adaptive servo-ventilation (1.28, 1.2-1.38).

conclusionsThis analysis of the largest dataset investigating PAP therapy termination identified a number of predictive factors. These can help health care providers chose the most appropriate PAP modality, identify specific patient phenotypes at higher risk of stopping PAP and target interventions to support ongoing therapy to these groups, as well as allow them to develop a risk stratification tool.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleGermanyHome Care ServicesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePhenotypePrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentCompliancePatient phenotypePositive airway pressureTherapy termination

Identifiers

PMID30518372
PMCPMC6280473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.