Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30517765›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2019

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs in Long-Term Care Settings: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Julie Hui-Chih Wu, Bradley J Langford, Nick Daneman, Jan O Friedrich, Gary Garber

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antibiotic stewardship practices at community living centers for veterans.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antibiotic Prescribing for Urinary Tract Infections in Women Residing in Long-Term Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Julie Hui-Chih WuInfection Prevention and Control, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bradley J LangfordInfection Prevention and Control, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nick DanemanInfection Prevention and Control, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jan O FriedrichDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gary GarberInfection Prevention and Control, Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial stewardship programs have been established in hospitals, but less studied in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), a setting with unique challenges related to patient populations and available resources. This systematic review sought to provide a comprehensive assessment of antimicrobial stewardship interventions implemented in LTCFs, using meta-analysis to examine their impact on overall antimicrobial use.

methodsElectronic searches of MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL (1990 to July 2018) identified any antimicrobial stewardship interventions in LTCFs, with no restriction on patient population, study design, or outcomes. Intervention components were categorized using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care taxonomy on implementation strategies. Random-effects meta-analysis used ratio of means to facilitate pooling of different metrics of antimicrobial use.

resultsEighteen studies (one randomized controlled trial [RCT], four cluster RCTs, four controlled pre/post studies, and nine uncontrolled pre/post studies) met inclusion, using 13 different antimicrobial stewardship intervention strategies; 15 studies used multifaceted (maximum, seven; median, four) interventions. The three most commonly implemented strategies were educational materials, educational meetings, and guideline implementation. Intervention labor intensity and resource requirements varied considerably among interventions. Meta-analysis of 11 studies demonstrated that antimicrobial stewardship strategies were associated with a 14% reduction in overall antimicrobial use (95% confidence interval = -8% to -20%; P < .0001), with similar results by study design but high heterogeneity (I

conclusionAntimicrobial stewardship strategies implemented in long-term care vary considerably in design and resource intensity, but collectively suggest potential to reduce antimicrobial use in this challenging setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:392-399, 2019.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipHealth Plan ImplementationHumansLong-Term Careantimicrobial stewardshipantimicrobial uselong-term care

Identifiers

PMID30517765
PMCPMC7379722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.