Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30517747›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2019

Allele-specific genome editing using CRISPR-Cas9 is associated with loss of heterozygosity in diploid yeast.

Arthur R Gorter de Vries, Lucas G F Couwenberg, Marcel van den Broek, Pilar de la Torre Cortés, Jolanda Ter Horst, Jack T Pronk, Jean-Marc G Daran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Progresses of transposon research inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Deconstruction ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Tips, Tricks, and Potential Pitfalls of CRISPR Genome Editing inFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arthur R Gorter de VriesDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629HZ, The Netherlands.
Lucas G F CouwenbergDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629HZ, The Netherlands.
Marcel van den BroekDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629HZ, The Netherlands.
Pilar de la Torre CortésDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629HZ, The Netherlands.
Jolanda Ter HorstDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629HZ, The Netherlands.
Jack T PronkDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629HZ, The Netherlands.
Jean-Marc G DaranDepartment of Biotechnology, Delft University of Technology, Delft 2629HZ, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) with CRISPR-Cas9 have revolutionized genetic modification by enabling efficient genome editing in a broad range of eukaryotic systems. Accurate gene editing is possible with near-perfect efficiency in haploid or (predominantly) homozygous genomes. However, genomes exhibiting polyploidy and/or high degrees of heterozygosity are less amenable to genetic modification. Here, we report an up to 99-fold lower gene editing efficiency when editing individual heterozygous loci in the yeast genome. Moreover, Cas9-mediated introduction of a DSB resulted in large scale loss of heterozygosity affecting DNA regions up to 360 kb and up to 1700 heterozygous nucleotides, due to replacement of sequences on the targeted chromosome by corresponding sequences from its non-targeted homolog. The observed patterns of loss of heterozygosity were consistent with homology directed repair. The extent and frequency of loss of heterozygosity represent a novel mutagenic side-effect of Cas9-mediated genome editing, which would have to be taken into account in eukaryotic gene editing. In addition to contributing to the limited genetic amenability of heterozygous yeasts, Cas9-mediated loss of heterozygosity could be particularly deleterious for human gene therapy, as loss of heterozygous functional copies of anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic genes is a known path to cancer.

Indexed as

DiploidyGene EditingAllelesCell ProliferationCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedHeterozygoteHomozygoteHumansLoss of HeterozygositySaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID30517747
PMCPMC6379674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.