Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30517522›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2018

The influence of mode of delivery on neonatal and maternal short and long-term outcomes.

Daniela Siqueira Prado, Rosemar Barbosa Mendes, Rosana Queiroz Gurgel, Ikaro Daniel de Carvalho Barreto, Rosana Cipolotti, Ricardo Queiroz Gurgel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Perinatal Mortality Analysis in Espírito Santo, Brazil, 2008 to 2017.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  13. Factors Influencing Uptake of Breastfeeding: The Role of Early Promotion in the Maternity Hospital.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela Siqueira PradoUniversidade Federal de Sergipe. Departamento de Medicina. Aracaju, SE, Brasil.
Rosemar Barbosa MendesUniversidade Federal de Sergipe. Departamento de Enfermagem. Aracaju, SE, Brasil.
Rosana Queiroz GurgelUniversidade Tiradentes. Departamento de Enfermagem. Aracaju, SE, Brasil.
Ikaro Daniel de Carvalho BarretoUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco. Pós-graduando do Programa de Biometria e Estatística Aplicada. Recife, PE, Brasil.
Rosana CipolottiUniversidade Federal de Sergipe. Departamento de Medicina. Aracaju, SE, Brasil.
Ricardo Queiroz GurgelUniversidade Federal de Sergipe. Departamento de Medicina. Aracaju, SE, Brasil.
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BRUniversidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco · BRUniversidade Tiradentes · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of mode of delivery on breastfeeding incentive practices and on neonatal and maternal short and long-term complications.

methodsA cohort study was conducted between June 2015 and April 2016 with 768 puerperal women from 11 maternities in Sergipe, interviewed in the first 24 hours, 45-60 days and 6-8 months after delivery. Associations between breastfeeding incentive practices, neonatal and maternal, both short-term and late complications, and the exposure variables were evaluated by the relative risk (95%CI) and the Fisher exact test.

resultsThe C-section newborns had less skin-to-skin contact immediately after delivery (intrapartum C-section: 0.18, 95%CI 0.1-0.31 and elective C-section: 0.36, 95%CI 0.27-0.47) and less breastfeeding within one hour of birth (intrapartum C-section: 0.43, 95%CI 0.29-0.63 and elective C-section: 0.44, 95%CI 0.33-0.59). Newborns from elective C-section were less frequently breastfed in the delivery room 0.42 (95%CI 0.2-0.88) and roomed-in less 0.85 (95%CI 0.77-0.95). Women submitted to intrapartum C-section had greater risk of early complications 1.3 (95%CI 1.04-1.64, p = 0.037) and sexual dysfunction 1.68 (95%CI 1.14-2.48, p = 0.027). The frequency of neonatal complications, urinary incontinence and depression according to the mode of delivery was similar.

conclusionsThe C-section was negatively associated with breastfeeding incentive practices; in addition, C-section after labor increased the risk of early maternal complications and sexual dysfunction.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBrazilBreast FeedingCesarean SectionChildDelivery, ObstetricDepression, PostpartumFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLabor PresentationPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy Complications

Identifiers

PMID30517522
PMCPMC6280623
OpenAlexW2901120371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.