Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30517521›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2018

Cost effectiveness of the cancer prevention program for carriers of the BRCA1/2 mutation.

Marcelo Cristiano de Azevedo Ramos, Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike Folgueira, Simone Maistro, Alessandro Gonçalves Campolina, Patricia Coelho de Soárez, Geertruida Hendrika de Bock, Hillegonda Maria Dutilh Novaes, Maria Del Pilar Estevez Diz

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The role of genomics in global cancer prevention.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Marcelo Cristiano de Azevedo RamosUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clínicas. Instituto Central. Diretoria Executiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Maria Aparecida Azevedo Koike FolgueiraUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clínicas. Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo. Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Simone MaistroUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clínicas. Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo. Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Alessandro Gonçalves CampolinaUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clínicas. Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo. Centro de Investigação Translacional em Oncologia. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Patricia Coelho de SoárezUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Geertruida Hendrika de BockUniversity of Groningen. University Medical Center Groningen. Department of Epidemiology. Groningen, The Netherlands.
Hillegonda Maria Dutilh NovaesUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Departamento de Medicina Preventiva. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Maria Del Pilar Estevez DizUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Medicina. Hospital das Clínicas. Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo. Divisão de Oncologia Clínica. São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital de Clínicas · UYInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo analyze the cost effectiveness of the diagnostic program for the germline mutation in BRCA1/2 genes and of preventative strategies for the relatives of patients diagnosed with ovarian cancer associated with this mutation.

methodsThe study analyzed the cost effectiveness by developing an analysis of the Markov decision process from the perspective of the National Health System. The strategies compared reflect upon the adoption of genetic testing and preventative strategies for relatives or the usual care currently proposed. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was expressed in terms of cost per case avoided. The sensitivity analysis was performed in a univariate and deterministic manner.

resultsThe study showed increments for effectiveness and for costs when performing genetic testing and adopting prophylactic measures for family members. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated at R$908.58 per case of cancer avoided, a figure considered lower than the study's cost-effectiveness threshold (R$7,543.50).

conclusionsThe program analyzed should be considered a cost-effective strategy for the national situation. Studies in various other countries have reached similar conclusions. One possible ramification of this research might the need to perform a budgetary-impact analysis of making the program one of the country's health policies.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA1Genes, BRCA2AdultAgedBrazilBreast NeoplasmsCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsProgram EvaluationReference Values

Identifiers

PMID30517521
PMCPMC6280621
OpenAlexW2915076975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.