Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30517247›Full record

ArticleRevista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo2018

An alternative storage method for characterization of the intestinal microbiota through next generation sequencing.

Roberto Marques Ribeiro, Marcela de Souza-Basqueira, Léa Campos de Oliveira, Flavia Cristina Salles, Natalia Bueno Pereira, Ester Cerdeira Sabino

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Impact of ExogenousAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Storage of soil microbiome for application in sustainable agriculture: prospects and challenges.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto Marques RibeiroUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcela de Souza-BasqueiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Léa Campos de OliveiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Medicina Laboratorial (LIM 03), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Flavia Cristina SallesUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Parasitologia (LIM 46), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Natalia Bueno PereiraUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Hospital das Clínicas, Laboratório de Parasitologia (LIM 46), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Ester Cerdeira SabinoUniversidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRHospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiota has been the subject of various molecular studies mainly due to its importance and wide-ranging relationships with human hosts. However, the storage of fecal samples prior to DNA extraction is critical when characterizing the composition of intestinal microbiota. Therefore, we aimed to understand the effects of different fecal storage methods to characterize intestinal microbiota using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) as well as to establish an alternative conservation method of bacterial genetic material in these samples using guanidine. Stool samples from 10 healthy volunteers were collected. Each sample was divided into five aliquots: one aliquot was extracted immediately after collection (fresh) and two aliquots were subjected to freezing at -20 °C or -80 °C and extracted after 48 h. The other two aliquots were stored in guanidine at room temperature or 4 °C and extracted after 48 h. The V4 hypervariable regions of the bacterial and archeal 16S rRNA gene were amplified by PCR and sequenced using an Ion Torrent PGM platform for NGS. The data were analyzed using QIIME software. Statistical significance was determined using a non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test. A total of 11,494,688 reads with acceptable quality were obtained. Unweighted principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed that the samples were clustered based on the host rather than by the storage group. At the phylum and genus levels, we observed statistically significant differences between two genera, Proteobacteria (p=0.013) and Suterella (p=0.004), comparing frozen samples with guanidine-stored samples. Our data suggest that the use of guanidine can preserve bacterial genetic materials as well as freezing, providing additional conveniences.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingAdultDNA, BacterialEducational StatusFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASpecimen HandlingDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID30517247
PMCPMC6282504
OpenAlexW2902507960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.