Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30517130›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Investigating clinical handover and healthcare communication for outpatients with chronic disease in India: A mixed-methods study.

Claire Humphries, Suganthi Jaganathan, Jeemon Panniyammakal, Sanjeev Singh, Shifalika Goenka, Prabhakaran Dorairaj, Paramjit Gill, Sheila Greenfield, Richard Lilford, Semira Manaseki-Holland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Patients', carers' and healthcare providers' views of patient-held health records in Kerala, India: A qualitative exploratory study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Claire HumphriesInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9784-5218
Suganthi JaganathanPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Jeemon PanniyammakalPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Sanjeev SinghHospital Administration, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India.
Shifalika GoenkaPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Prabhakaran DorairajPublic Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, Delhi, India.
Paramjit GillAcademic Unit of Primary Care, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Sheila GreenfieldInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom.
Richard LilfordCentre for Applied Health Research and Delivery, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Semira Manaseki-HollandInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M00287X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesResearch concentrating on continuity of care for chronic, non-communicable disease (NCD) patients in resource-constrained settings is currently limited and focusses on inpatients. Outpatient care requires attention as this is where NCD patients often seek treatment and optimal handover of information is essential. We investigated handover, healthcare communication and barriers to continuity of care for chronic NCD outpatients in India. We also explored potential interventions for improving storage and exchange of healthcare information.

methodsA mixed-methods design was used across five healthcare facilities in Kerala and Himachal Pradesh states. Questionnaires from 513 outpatients with cardiovascular disease, chronic respiratory disease, or diabetes covered the form and comprehensiveness of information exchange between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and between HCPs and patients. Semi-structured interviews with outpatients and HCPs explored handover, healthcare communication and intervention ideas. Barriers to continuity of care were identified through triangulation of all data sources.

resultsAlmost half (46%) of patients self-referred to hospital outpatient clinics (OPCs). Patient-held healthcare information was often poorly recorded on unstructured sheets of paper; 24% of OPC documents contained the following: diagnosis, medication, long-term care and follow-up information. Just 55% of patients recalled receiving verbal follow-up and medication instructions during OPC appointments. Qualitative themes included patient preference for hospital visits, system factors, inconsistent doctor-patient communication and attitudes towards medical documents. Barriers were hospital time constraints, inconsistent referral practices and absences of OPC medical record-keeping, structured patient-held medical documents and clinical handover training. Patients and HCPs were in favour of the introduction of patient-held booklets for storing and transporting medical documents.

conclusionsDeficiencies in communicative practices are compromising the continuity of chronic NCD outpatient care. Targeted systems-based interventions are urgently required to improve information provision and exchange. Our findings indicate that well-designed patient-held booklets are likely to be an acceptable, affordable and effective part of the solution.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareAttitude of Health PersonnelChronic DiseaseCommunicationContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansIndiaInterprofessional RelationsMaleMiddle AgedOutpatients

Identifiers

PMID30517130
PMCPMC6281223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.