ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2019
Experimentally Derived and Computationally Optimized Backbone Conformational Statistics for Blocked Amino Acids.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chitosan Polysaccharides from a Polarizable Multiscale Approach.ACS omega · 2023Article
- Phase Transitions of Associative Biomacromolecules.Chemical reviews · 2023Review
- Controlled "off-on" fluorescent probe for the specific detection of hyperhomocysteinemia.RSC advances · 2021Article
- Article
- Improvements to the ABSINTH Force Field for Proteins Based on Experimentally Derived Amino Acid Specific Backbone Conformational Statistics.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Experimentally derived, amino acid specific backbone dihedral angle distributions are invaluable for modeling data-driven conformational equilibria of proteins and for enabling quantitative assessments of the accuracies of molecular mechanics force fields. The protein coil library that is extracted from analysis of high-resolution structures of proteins has served as a useful proxy for quantifying intrinsic and context-dependent conformational distributions of amino acids. However, data that go into coil libraries will have hidden biases, and ad hoc procedures must be used to remove these biases. Here, we combine high-resolution biased information from protein structural databases with unbiased low-resolution information from spectroscopic measurements of blocked amino acids to obtain experimentally derived and computationally optimized coil-library landscapes for each of the 20 naturally occurring amino acids. Quantitative descriptions of conformational distributions require parsing of data into conformational basins with defined envelopes, centers, and statistical weights. We develop and deploy a numerical method to extract conformational basins. The weights of conformational basins are optimized to reproduce quantitative inferences drawn from spectroscopic experiments for blocked amino acids. The optimized distributions serve as touchstones for assessments of intrinsic conformational preferences and for quantitative comparisons of molecular mechanics force fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.