Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30516650›Full record

Observational studyEpidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)2019

Is the Association Between Pregnancy Weight Gain and Fetal Size Causal?: A Re-examination Using a Sibling Comparison Design.

Jennifer A Hutcheon, Olof Stephansson, Sven Cnattingius, Lisa M Bodnar, Kari Johansson

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer A HutcheonFrom the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Olof StephanssonDepartment of Medicine, Solna, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Sven CnattingiusDepartment of Medicine, Solna, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lisa M BodnarDepartment of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Kari JohanssonDepartment of Medicine, Solna, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Innovative Approaches to Inform Evidence-Based Pregnancy Weight Gain GuidelinesR01HD072008 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BODNAR, LISA M, HUTCHEON, JENNIFER ANNE · 2013 to 2016
$2.4M
Innovative approaches to inform evidence-based pregnancy weight gain guidelinesR01HD094777 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BODNAR, LISA M, HUTCHEON, JENNIFER ANNE · 2018 to 2021
$2.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD072008NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094777
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObservational cohort studies have consistently shown that maternal weight gain in pregnancy is positively associated with fetal size, but it is unknown whether the association is causal. This study investigated the effect of pregnancy weight gain on fetal growth using a sibling comparison design to control for unmeasured confounding by genetic and shared environmental factors.

methodsOur study population included 44,457 infants (21,680 women) with electronic medical records in the Stockholm-Gotland Obstetrical Database, 2008-2014. We standardized pregnancy weight gain into gestational age-specific z-scores. Fetal size was classified as birthweight (gram), and as small- and large-for-gestational-age birth (birthweight <10th or >90th percentiles, respectively). Our sibling comparison analyses used multivariable linear fixed effects models for birthweight and hybrid logistic fixed effects models for small- and large-for-gestational-age birth (SGA and LGA). We repeated analyses using conventional (unmatched) regression models.

resultsSibling comparison analyses showed a clinically meaningful association between weight gain and fetal size (e.g., adjusted difference of +89 g birthweight [95% CI = 82, 95 g]; adjusted risk ratios [aRR] for SGA of 0.80 [95% CI = 0.75, 0.86] per 1 z-score increase in weight gain for a woman of body mass index [BMI] = 25). These findings were consistent across the range of BMI. Estimates were only modestly attenuated compared with conventional approach (+97 g [95% CI = 92, 102 g], aRR for SGA of 0.70 [95% CI = 0.67, 0.73] per 1 z-score increase in weight gain).

conclusionThe positive association between pregnancy weight gain and fetal size we found using a sibling comparison design suggests that this relation has minimal confounding by familial factors that remain constant between pregnancies.

Indexed as

Birth WeightFetal DevelopmentGestational Weight GainBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeOdds RatioPregnancyRisk FactorsSiblingsSweden

Identifiers

PMID30516650
PMCPMC6369897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.