Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30516238›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2019

Fundamental Roles of Axial Stretch in Isometric and Isobaric Evaluations of Vascular Contractility.

Alexander W Caulk, Jay D Humphrey, Sae-Il Murtada

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inverse finite element identification of murine aortic material properties:Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Smooth muscle contribution to vaginal viscoelastic response.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2023
    Article
  8. Role of smooth muscle activation in the static and dynamic mechanical characterization of human aortas.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Characterization of the active response of a guinea pig carotid artery.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  10. Developmental origins of mechanical homeostasis in the aorta.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Experimental measurement and modeling analysis of active and passive mechanical properties of arterial vessel wall].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Measuring Arterial Stiffness in Animal Experimental Studies.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Maladaptive aortic remodeling in hypertension associates with dysfunctional smooth muscle contractility.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander W CaulkDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.
Jay D HumphreyFellow ASME Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520.
Sae-Il MurtadaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, 55 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06520 e-mail: .
Yale University · US

Funding

Mechanisms Underlying The Progression of Large Artery Stiffness in HypertensionR01HL105297 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI FIGUEROA, CARLOS ALBERTO, HUMPHREY, JAY D. · 2010 to 2019
$3.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) can regulate arterial mechanics via contractile activity in response to changing mechanical and chemical signals. Contractility is traditionally evaluated via uniaxial isometric testing of isolated rings despite the in vivo environment being very different. Most blood vessels maintain a locally preferred value of in vivo axial stretch while subjected to changes in distending pressure, but both of these phenomena are obscured in uniaxial isometric testing. Few studies have rigorously analyzed the role of in vivo loading conditions in smooth muscle function. Thus, we evaluated effects of uniaxial versus biaxial deformations on smooth muscle contractility by stimulating two regions of the mouse aorta with different vasoconstrictors using one of three testing protocols: (i) uniaxial isometric testing, (ii) biaxial isometric testing, and (iii) axially isometric plus isobaric testing. Comparison of methods (i) and (ii) revealed increased sensitivity and contractile capacity to potassium chloride and phenylephrine (PE) with biaxial isometric testing, and comparison of methods (ii) and (iii) revealed a further increase in contractile capacity with isometric plus isobaric testing. Importantly, regional differences in estimated in vivo axial stretch suggest locally distinct optimal biaxial configurations for achieving maximal smooth muscle contraction, which can only be revealed with biaxial testing. Such differences highlight the importance of considering in vivo loading and geometric configurations when evaluating smooth muscle function. Given the physiologic relevance of axial extension and luminal pressurization, we submit that, when possible, axially isometric plus isobaric testing should be employed to evaluate vascular smooth muscle contractile function.

Indexed as

Isometric ContractionMechanical PhenomenaVasoconstrictionAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaMaleMaterials TestingMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle, Smooth, Vascular

Identifiers

PMID30516238
PMCPMC6379827
OpenAlexW2902268549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.