ReviewImmunologic research2018
Review of the "X chromosome-nucleolus nexus" hypothesis of autoimmune diseases with an update explaining disruption of the nucleolus.
Review in Immunologic research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Nucleolus in Human Disease: Ribosome Biogenesis, Nucleolar Surveillance, and Therapeutic Opportunities.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Polyamine Dysregulation and Nucleolar Disruption in Alzheimer's Disease.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Article
- Editorial: autoimmunity-the ever endless world.Immunologic research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The "X chromosome-nucleolus nexus" hypothesis provides a comprehensive explanation of how autoantibodies can develop following cellular stress. The hypothesis connects autoimmune diseases with the impact of environmental factors, such as viruses, through epigenetic disruption. The inactive X chromosome, a major epigenetic structure in the female cell's nucleus, is a key component of the hypothesis. The inactive X is vulnerable to disruption due to the following: (1) its heavy requirements for methylation to suppress gene expression, (2) its peripheral location at the nuclear envelope, (3) its late replication timing, and (4) its frequently observed close association with the nucleolus. The dynamic nucleolus can expand dramatically in response to cellular stress and this could disrupt the neighboring inactive X, particularly during replication, leading to expression from previously suppressed chromatin. Especially vulnerable at the surface of the inactive X chromosome would be genes and elements from Xp22 to the terminus of the short arm of the X. Expression of these genes and elements could interfere with nucleolar integrity, nucleolar efficiency, and future nucleolar stress response, and even lead to fragmentation of the nucleolus. Ribonucleoprotein complexes assembled in the nucleolus could be left in incomplete states and inappropriate conformations, and/or contain viral components when the nucleolus is disrupted and these abnormal complexes could initiate an autoimmune response when exposed to the immune system. Epitope spreading could then lead to an autoimmune reaction to the more abundant normal complexes. Many autoantigens reported in lupus and other autoimmune diseases are, at least transiently, nucleolar components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.