ReviewDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019
[New treatment options for iridociliary tumors].
Review in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proton beam radiation for iris melanoma: case series and review of literature.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Tectonic Keratoplasty to Restore the Bulbar Wall after Block Excision of Benign and Malignant Intraocular Tumors.Journal of ophthalmology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBenign iridal tumors rarely necessitate a therapeutic intervention. In contrast, malignant tumors of the iris can threaten the patient's life and eyesight and require early treatment to prevent the development of metastases.
objectivePresentation of current treatment options for iridal tumors with special emphasis on iridal melanoma.
methodsThis article gives an overview of the current literature based on a PubMed search as well as own clinical experience.
resultsTreatment options for iridal and ciliary body melanomas comprise radiotherapeutic and surgical (eyeball-sparing and non-sparing) approaches. The eyeball-sparing surgical procedure of choice is block excision. While local tumor control rates and metastasis rates of block excision and radiotherapy are comparable, there are distinct differences especially between the spectra of complications. New treatment procedures include immunomodulatory approaches and targeted therapies. Using checkpoint inhibitors, no convincing enhancement of overall survival could be demonstrated for metastatic iridal melanoma, as is the case for cutaneous melanoma. In contrast, tumor vaccination with the help of tumor RNA-laden patient-derived dendritic cells seems to be a promising option for a subgroup of high-risk patients. Targeted therapies aiming to suppress the MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways could not achieve any improvement in patient survival.
conclusionFor the primary treatment of iridal melanoma a surgical, eyeball-sparing approach and also when appropriate, radiotherapy can be recommended. In the future, eligible high-risk patients could profit from a tumor vaccination. To date, there is no effective systemic treatment for metastatic iridal melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.