Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30515559›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2019

Radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy after craniospinal irradiation in children and adults with medulloblastoma and ependymoma.

Aleksandra Napieralska, Iwona Brąclik, Michał Radwan, Marek Mandera, Sławomir Blamek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandra NapieralskaDepartment of Radiotherapy, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, Ul. Wybrzeże AK 15, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland. olanapieralska@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7390-9165
Iwona BrąclikDepartment of Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy Planning, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, ul. Wybrzeze AK 15, Gliwice, 44-101, Polska.
Michał RadwanDepartment of Radiotherapy and Brachytherapy Planning, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, ul. Wybrzeze AK 15, Gliwice, 44-101, Polska.
Marek ManderaDepartment of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Sławomir BlamekDepartment of Radiotherapy, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, Ul. Wybrzeże AK 15, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland.
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLMedical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the results and tolerance of radiosurgery/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy performed after craniospinal irradiation for recurrent tumor.

methodsFourteen patients aged 3-46 years, diagnosed with medulloblastoma (10), anaplastic ependymoma (3), and primitive neuroectodermal tumor (1). All patients had craniospinal irradiation (CSI) with the total dose of 30.6-36 Gy and boost to 53.9-60 Gy either during primary or during second-line treatment. Twelve patients were irradiated with a single dose of 6-15 Gy (median 14.5 Gy). One received three fractions of 5 Gy and one six fractions of 5 Gy. In statistical analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used. The overall survival was calculated from the date of the end of stereotactic radiosurgery to the date of death or last contact.

resultsRecurrences were diagnosed after the median time of 16 months after the end of primary treatment. Eleven patients died during the follow-up. The follow-up for the 3 patients still alive was 6.7, 40.5, and 41.4 months, respectively. One- and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 70% and 39%. Patients who had ECOG performance status of 0 at the time of diagnosis of the disease trended to have better 2-year OS compared to those evaluated as ECOG 1 (p = 0.057). Treatment results were evaluable in 12 patients. Local control (stabilization or regression of the lesion) was achieved in 9 (75%). Overall disease progression was 67%. No patient developed radiation-induced necrosis. The treatment was well tolerated and no serious adverse effects were observed. Eleven patients were given steroids as a prevention of brain edema and four of them needed continuation of this treatment afterwards. In 7 patients, symptoms of brain edema were observed during the first weeks after reirradiation.

conclusionsStereotactic radiosurgery or hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is an effective treatment method of the local recurrence after CSI and can be performed safely in heavily pre-treated patients.

Indexed as

AdultBrain NeoplasmsCerebellar NeoplasmsChildCraniospinal IrradiationDose Fractionation, RadiationEpendymomaFemaleHumansMaleMedulloblastomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeuroectodermal Tumors, PrimitiveRadiosurgeryYoung AdultCSIRadiotherapyRecurrenceReirradiation

Identifiers

PMID30515559
PMCPMC6351705
OpenAlexW2902586427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.