Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30515519›Full record

Observational studyJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2018

The Effects of Static and Moving Spectral Ripple Sensitivity on Unaided and Aided Speech Perception in Noise.

Christi W Miller, Joshua G W Bernstein, Xuyang Zhang, Yu-Hsiang Wu, Ruth A Bentler, Kelly Tremblay

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Spectral aliasing in an acoustic spectral ripple discrimination task.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2020
    Article
  4. Contributions to Speech-Cue Weighting in Older Adults With Impaired Hearing.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christi W MillerDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.
Joshua G W BernsteinNational Military Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD.
Xuyang ZhangDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Yu-Hsiang WuDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Ruth A BentlerDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
Kelly TremblayDepartment of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Bob McMurray · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON RESEARCH CORE CENTERP30DC004661 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RAIBLE, DAVID W, STONE, JENNIFER S. · 2000 to 2014
$11.1M
The University of Iowa Clinical and Translational Science AwardU54TR001356 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WINOKUR, PATRICIA · 2015 to 2016
$7.1M
Linking SNR to hearing aid successR01DC012769 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BENTLER, RUTH A, TREMBLAY, KELLY · 2013 to 2017
$1.4M
Maximizing hearing aid outcomes with spectro-temporal modulation sensitivityR21DC016380 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MILLER, CHRISTI WISE · 2018 to 2020
$455k
NCATS NIH HHS U54 TR001356NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC004661NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012769NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated whether certain spectral ripple conditions were more informative than others in predicting ecologically relevant unaided and aided speech outcomes. Method: A quasi-experimental study design was used to evaluate 67 older adult hearing aid users with bilateral, symmetrical hearing loss. Speech perception in noise was tested under conditions of unaided and aided, auditory-only and auditory-visual, and 2 types of noise. Predictors included age, audiometric thresholds, audibility, hearing aid compression, and modulation depth detection thresholds for moving (4-Hz) or static (0-Hz) 2-cycle/octave spectral ripples applied to carriers of broadband noise or 2000-Hz low- or high-pass filtered noise. Results: A principal component analysis of the modulation detection data found that broadband and low-pass static and moving ripple detection thresholds loaded onto the first factor whereas high-pass static and moving ripple detection thresholds loaded onto a second factor. A linear mixed model revealed that audibility and the first factor (reflecting broadband and low-pass static and moving ripples) were significantly associated with speech perception performance. Similar results were found for unaided and aided speech scores. The interactions between speech conditions were not significant, suggesting that the relationship between ripples and speech perception was consistent regardless of visual cues or noise condition. High-pass ripple sensitivity was not correlated with speech understanding. Conclusions: The results suggest that, for hearing aid users, poor speech understanding in noise and sensitivity to both static and slow-moving ripples may reflect deficits in the same underlying auditory processing mechanism. Significant factor loadings involving ripple stimuli with low-frequency content may suggest an impaired ability to use temporal fine structure information in the stimulus waveform. Support is provided for the use of spectral ripple testing to predict speech perception outcomes in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdultAgedAudiometry, SpeechAuditory ThresholdFemaleHearing AidsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNoiseNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicPerceptual MaskingSpeech PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30515519
PMCPMC6440313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.