ArticleJournal of pregnancy2018
Patient Preferences and Experiences in Hyperemesis Gravidarum Treatment: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of pregnancy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rating of four different foods in women with hyperemesis gravidarum: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open · 2021Trial
- Use of antiemetics in early pregnancy 2012-2022: A cross-sectional study.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Article
- The Australian MotherSafe enhanced service for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum: a mixed methods study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- A scoping review of models of care and services for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy and hyperemesis gravidarum.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- How are hospitals in England, Scotland and Wales caring for women with nausea and vomiting in pregnancy: a national service evaluation.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Wernicke encephalopathy in pregnancy associated with hyperemesis gravidarum: a case report.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Proximate and ultimate causes of pregnancy sickness.Evolution, medicine, and public health · 2025Review
- Hyperemesis gravidarum severity, enteral tube feeding and cardiometabolic markers in offspring cord blood.The British journal of nutrition · 2022Article
- Systematic evidence map of evidence addressing the top 10 priority research questions for hyperemesis gravidarum.BMJ open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHyperemesis gravidarum (HG) medical therapies are currently of limited effect, which creates a larger role for patient preferences in the way HG care is arranged. This is the first study using in-depth interviews to investigate patients' preferences and experiences of HG treatment. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted individual in-depth interviews among women who had been hospitalized for HG in North Holland at least once in the past 4 years. We asked them about their experiences, preferences, and suggestions for improvement regarding the HG treatment they received. The sample size was determined by reaching data saturation. Themes were identified from analysis of the interview transcripts. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: 13 women were interviewed. Interviewees emphasized the importance of early recognition of the severity of HG, increasing caregivers' knowledge on HG, early medical intervention, and nasogastric tube feeding. They valued a single room in hospital, discussion of treatment options, more possibilities of home-treatment, psychological support during HG and after childbirth, and more uniform information and policies regarding HG treatment.
conclusionFurther research is needed to establish whether the suggestions can lead to more (cost) effective care and improve the course of HG and outcomes for HG patients and their children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.