ArticleJournal of healthcare engineering2018
A Computer-Aided Pipeline for Automatic Lung Cancer Classification on Computed Tomography Scans.
Article in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Automated Segmentation Methods and Public Datasets for the Lung and its Lobes and Findings on Computed Tomography Images.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2022Pooled it
- Determination of lung cancer exhaled breath biomarkers using machine learning-a new analysis framework.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Multitask Network for the Diagnosis of Autoimmune Gastritis.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Enhancing lung cancer detection through hybrid features and machine learning hyperparameters optimization techniques.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Healthcare As a Service (HAAS): CNN-based cloud computing model for ubiquitous access to lung cancer diagnosis.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Ensemble Federated Learning Approach for Diagnostics of Multi-Order Lung Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Identification and Classification of Lungs Focal Opacity Using CNN Segmentation and Optimal Feature Selection.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023Article
- Ensemble Learning Framework with GLCM Texture Extraction for Early Detection of Lung Cancer on CT Images.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the most common cancer types. For the survival of the patient, early detection of lung cancer with the best treatment method is crucial. In this study, we propose a novel computer-aided pipeline on computed tomography (CT) scans for early diagnosis of lung cancer thanks to the classification of benign and malignant nodules. The proposed pipeline is composed of four stages. In preprocessing steps, CT images are enhanced, and lung volumes are extracted from the image with the help of a novel method called lung volume extraction method (LUVEM). The significance of the proposed pipeline is using LUVEM for extracting lung region. In nodule detection stage, candidate nodules are determined according to the circular Hough transform- (CHT-) based method. Then, lung nodules are segmented with self-organizing maps (SOM). In feature computation stage, intensity, shape, texture, energy, and combined features are used for feature extraction, and principal component analysis (PCA) is used for feature reduction step. In the final stage, probabilistic neural network (PNN) classifies benign and malign nodules. According to the experiments performed on our dataset, the proposed pipeline system can classify benign and malign nodules with 95.91% accuracy, 97.42% sensitivity, and 94.24% specificity. Even in cases of small-sized nodules (3-10 mm), the proposed system can determine the nodule type with 94.68% accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.